[Pce] Re: Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

The early allocation is completed. See
https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:25 PM Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> We did not receive any objections and thus we will be going ahead with the
> early allocation.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 11:21 AM Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>> We have received a request from the authors
>> of draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy for an early code point allocation for
>> the codepoints listed in -
>>
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.1
>> (TBD1)
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.2-4
>> (TBD2)
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.3
>> (TBD3-5)
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-09.html#section-9.4
>> (TBD6)
>>
>> RFC 7120 requires one to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>>
>> b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
>> handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
>> (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
>> in an Internet-Draft.
>>
>> c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
>> there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
>> specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>>
>> According to the chairs’ review, the RFC 7120 criteria are met; if you
>> disagree and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or believe
>> that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please
>> send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by August 19th.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv & Julien
>>
>