Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

Peng Liu | 刘鹏 <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> Thu, 22 April 2021 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83143A120E; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HDRS_MISSP=2.499, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dl6VemUuyC6H; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6853A1205; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee46081901d6eb-a9e6f; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:02:55 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee46081901d6eb-a9e6f
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from LAPTOP-NEH48QIJ (unknown[120.244.192.209]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea6081901c3a7-45719; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:02:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea6081901c3a7-45719
MIME-Version: 1.0
x-PcFlag: 9cf84d2f-5f5f-4bcb-83f6-d5b8e5048923_2_24763
X-Mailer: PC_RICHMAIL 2.8.5
Date: 22 Apr 2021 23:02:53 +0800
From: =?utf-8?B?UGVuZyBMaXUgfCDliJjpuY8=?=<liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?RGhydXYgRGhvZHk=?=<dd@dhruvdhody.com>, pce<pce@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath<draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210422230253877442112@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/Alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart877442112_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/UpOVftamYM7Ucsp0-y5ci6A3nog>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:03:18 -0000


Hi WG,




I support the adoption of this draft. It's useful for the multipath and to apply with SR policy.




Regards,

Peng Liu








 



发件人: Dhruv Dhody

时间: 2021/04/14(星期三)22:52

收件人: pce;

抄送人: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath;

主题: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 

Hi WG,
 
 This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.
 
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
 
 Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.  


  

Please respond by Wednesday 28th April.
 
 Thanks!
 Dhruv &amp; Julien