[Pce] Implementation option of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-interdomain-01.txt

olivier.dugeon@orange.com Mon, 22 February 2021 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095E63A1ED5 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:35:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.213
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.213 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-PadQpVXmB7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B503A1EC8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4DkrTR1LVmz8tBR for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:35:23 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1614018923; bh=vSHcNBtTjFmjtlnxbJCBMQXucbCAaCXih7fskdnTbi4=; h=To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M0tphaSRtz6Ff+xJMNVUCRh5yt8FRca9cop5dAyVWy+3y8Lnv2GNLWk/nyR8WZQUW y1geNwQ4giRT5sZZnxoGJoPD51hVwOmEzAZrO0UeD9FRT+Ej+ko+3IQVCPBSM98BXZ URaCl69u3HEkaJBp5SK3IVbqovH5OQ0mDyab9lAF+A6p5NmjuEOBlz4wf8mJ5FRlbL X06Wl+F7KsRqV7H+UCYNDJfUMGdHpntt8+m97fkMSFoio7/jVCCcVYWTML5XYeQskc jcjRlB2VWyAk0OxJX/nbVuQz2sCOm6VdU6J3QxmU7GDD5y68NSlXz8z8yEHSqbdCWU IsScIrD6IEs1Q==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme3.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.50.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4DkrTR0QP2zCqpm for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:35:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.192.148.170] (10.114.50.248) by exchange-eme3.itn.ftgroup (10.114.50.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:35:22 +0100
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
From: <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
Organization: Orange Labs
Message-ID: <32373_1614018923_6033F96B_32373_329_1_aa05da94-089a-fc73-ca40-8bead8f6a013@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:35:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.50.248]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/YdSwpgswj6sHDWAOhl8PGuUypLc>
Subject: [Pce] Implementation option of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-interdomain-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:35:27 -0000

Dear all,

According to the remark about implementation we got during the WG call
for adoption, we would start a new thread to discuss this point.
The goal isto prepare the discussion for next IETF meeting and reach a
consensusin order to edit revision 2 of the draft.

The stitching label principle requires at least a certain number of
modifications in the current PCEP version:

 a) A new PCE Capability to announce the inter-domain behaviour
 b) A new PCE Association Group to associate the local paths identifier
    to the inter-domain identifier
 c) new PCEP Errors to manage the Stitching Label exchange
 d) A mechanism to convey the Stitching Label

If there is no other choice than to reuse existing PCEP Objects by
allocating new code points for modifications a-c,there is several
options for point d, which we have tried to list below:

 d1) Use ERO and RRO in conjunction to new Path Setup code points as
     described in version 01 of the draft. It is the simplest
     implementation but as mention by Dhruv, each time a new path
     enforcement appear, a new PST code point must be allocated.
     For example, when Segment Routing v6 will be standardized, we must
     allocate a new Stitching label PST code point for SRv6.
 d2) Use ERO and ERO in conjunction to a new flag in LSP. Simple as for d1,
     but need to use the LSP Extended Flag draft as all LSP flags have been
     already allocated.
 d3) Same as d2 but find another place for the flag e.g. SRP or LSPA Object.
 d4) Define a new PCEP sub-Objet TLV within the LSP Object to convey the
     stitching label. This is more independent but need extra parsing from
     an implementation point of view.

Please, give us your opinion about these different options and don't hesitate
to propose others.

Regards

Olivier on be-half of co-author's




_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.