[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

Please find a proposed update that merges draft-farrel-pce-experimental-
errors -
https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.html
Diff:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-pce-iana-update&url_2=https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.txt

Please let us know if you have an objection to this update. Authors will
post the revision in the datatracker next week and will request Julien to
move this I-D quickly.
Feel free to also provide your comments and edits.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Adrian

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:59 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We have clear support and no objection on adopting this small I-D: it is
> now a PCE WG item.
>
> @Authors: please re-submit the draft as draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-00.
>
> @Authors of draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors: please talk to the
> authors of the aforementioned I-D to consider adding your proposal as a
> contribution into this new WG effort.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Julien
>
>
> Le 30/07/2024 à 10:36, [e-mail] a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider
> > adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP
> > registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted
> > draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring
> > higher consistency among PCEP registries.
> >
> > As a result, does the WG support the adoption of
> > draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your
> > feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case
> > you're opposed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Julien
> >
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>