[Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5088 (6459)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 08 March 2021 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DD73A0060 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 02:38:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeBxZJ1tnhPO for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 02:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DAE3A0045 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 02:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8967FF40756; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 02:38:19 -0800 (PST)
To: jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com, jpv@cisco.com, y.ikejiri@ntt.com, raymond.zhang@bt.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, dd@dhruvdhody.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietfc@btconnect.com, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210308103819.8967FF40756@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 02:38:19 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/_GEzU85MaD6cOhOyhQ6J1kqn9wA>
Subject: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5088 (6459)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:38:32 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5088,
"OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6459

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>

Section: 7.2

Original Text
-------------
   This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in
   the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.1.5.


Corrected Text
--------------
   This document provides new capability bit flags, which are present in
   the PCE-CAP-FLAGS TLV referenced in Section 4.5.


Notes
-----
There is no Section 4.1.5.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5088 (draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
Publication Date    : January 2008
Author(s)           : JL. Le Roux, Ed., JP. Vasseur, Ed., Y. Ikejiri, R. Zhang
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG