IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> Fri, 04 September 2020 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <hari@netflix.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A3D3A1044 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netflix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1EqCApKDQL7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C277F3A1042 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id l4so7584053ilq.2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OudomCIk1g5xL/oGgbtAqbKUzN1LoaIZuwB+FAhDHA4=; b=DChrjK5hMH+5KXj7C8wcZ1swmiADiuFT3VkMYy0ckWDhmgPiJMKZMV+Rd2t9dc/AkO iWe1grP453P2zdmQLpRrTKqVrfIt5oxya/+BohiEBvhkUF6xqIcBlNtWPgPe35Lcr1SE MV1U4zqJtN14Arabs3I23bXQew/w6RiEJ3UzQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OudomCIk1g5xL/oGgbtAqbKUzN1LoaIZuwB+FAhDHA4=; b=TcLPgUq9E7XfegcJmz1nFhpWfPCTcpq6IULcl91cRW8xCQuBK2jcNI5xYdYnxDvG3k zdsd09duLd9iXolNZ6fG0hIl7iNlrAjP6ex4g/4zuH8afG2SHtNKtU/r3w/7897+X7kv 3L9nq/A5YbnMwKMfcCKOT85ZwKBZAGkeAf3cHG6Ku3adk+WlAp1txJs0c0+67JIO54xZ PuPbmz9I0ZLIh8oACQYgEbV17wRZn7DVHEVj6Q3OB3RSC/a4vpxpDe3zrV8t6cbbvrxo ojKWbrSPCjyuWEYYfiB5t8+x9pviZxWQq7ld/k4eNNnUMcA6cBq1ntPNkUVMQOnv/kM9 meDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wPQtQap5SBN+5bFDRjY8rVQU+2hJXvpmvXdoWG6EsSnRo7K1z BC+2hCAlqwEwVFdxOQFUYDER/ijheeimQl+etuYkOw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhcO3/+TAvyp312s/EZrFdS4jaocVVuKwqxXeGEKzCrA9zGFcDZuUjJbcWCuD5rzhe4NgEmXzG2Lnw0yJcnGw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c205:: with SMTP id j5mr9857689ilo.300.1599253697544; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:08:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL70W4rbGdPdwFrh2pZRHVzeE5+0zVAfPN-zuOX2qSY5Uu7aUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: slitkows@cisco.com, msiva282@gmail.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com>, Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>, c.l@huawei.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c84be05ae834498"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/_UdgeDdjVjCj0-wCl9dEl39ijLo>
Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 21:08:21 -0000

Hi Authors,

In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
timely manner.

Thanks,
- Hari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email