Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747AF129BB0; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwoRDCQ8yDiX; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB257129BAE; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1489443188; x=1490652788; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=UiHBslG4bpadWklORzPBNMpiEFaRLQ8ZpXxqxkhj7uE=; b=gjR54Y3X3vkuNRjhJD22YiJYs/jbNeNJeqiKMWbfZUNsbAeU/f4Km1wk 4UE/khg9KvJjRMWxUGY9I0YQoK+vDAB1B4RtEywtNAvrOlDBarr5PZfMZ +FnNqY+bW8ZDUblWmuXUKxg7JGnCspyLmaMQY1yM3EuYmzSW/B8QzRaRd U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASAgCQGMdY/4wNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1GBaweDWYoOkTIfkyyCD4IOhiICGoJIPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQQBIxFFBQsCAQgaAh8HAgICMBUQAgQBDQWJeAiuAIImilkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQuFQ4IFCIJih1ougjEBBJYAhkEBkjgKgVkBF48qiEWKfQEfOIEEWBVSAYR7gUp1iFWBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,161,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="219893731"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Mar 2017 22:13:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2DMD6oV008126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:13:06 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:13:05 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:13:05 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQFv2IiCCztNbLo8K4e0RY+HJjuGsaJY0KHwgAAdC4A=
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:13:05 +0000
Message-ID: <ECFA6603-D2E5-47D1-9817-58E2CD8BD939@cisco.com>
References: <148943037921.9243.15715481484070651192.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <02ef01d29c41$70f69060$52e3b120$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02ef01d29c41$70f69060$52e3b120$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7CA86BCC0F74B44DB24EF47880B53F8D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/aJHhEZZgecyz2n_Rgb61vmVwgCY>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:13:13 -0000

On 3/13/17, 5:33 PM, "iesg on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <iesg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Ideally, everyone just gets on with it and the security update is handled by
> draft-ietf-pce-pceps.

I agree.  That security update doesn’t belong in this document.

Alvaro.