Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 04 October 2019 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC49120048 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdIaeUnn5sZW for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E398120074 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id y3so7176137ljj.6 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iajXoSJ5PsnSYM4VlSYH/maA6LgrUt6VSuXKvwsB6bU=; b=Z9j1aO4GkM9yTBHxYFPpDSL/Cr+fS0OunitfE2htMzWIFVQ9UcfdeOs9z1qp/SjBMl wrFiS7GnVx3jhTbvmLPProIGEVpRhakKWh0tCVhqvTJ2MPHg+4nKMF52hOk5pGtDy7GU C4NltuIG0p83o35nrobwl2kzjBwGZpEgSChebLlomFSMDK6i2oaOI62zhL2pFcm21rNB GQGPbR+4NuptoLQ1P/H55fdTDQvujll7aGEtjjjPLNXZI1vjT5Xa8BQ2R8T1hX9/brXu EAMin4LZ0oiPmsOu4+Sb3y4m/ExcDXlJCKREiN2IMu9ENvqLsFuDxiWB4xbtGy74OQpR o0Dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iajXoSJ5PsnSYM4VlSYH/maA6LgrUt6VSuXKvwsB6bU=; b=Y/MR19PxFDKcGc5E2+qeEXt14yTvZnxKiwVf6m0ZYe4UwhaoNB7lKFKFHJL8wtp77S /Bgtxv2IlRMSvhp1fUuDu9cZgRk10Vdz93FJrJwXjmTOJHAxbTxJJXE7p3nZY6OGDPl3 4AfW7/jp8brz58zrOqFvZERGf0c/JqwRKjw4SpUt9r8pqWEMOG2yOhMPCmyoHU8pB3wI 6eWgX0ahn8VrqO3WL8ARVMrGtYRWMs0LEj9D2//G4FIJxXK7mIiG2bhGGnZm47WhAK+k qPDSrfIy9uqQXoSYXnTlf+Jk34UuGcp1Cd39lstT+Wvv/f4QOy8Ocu2Cwgwvf5dXG5mx H3yQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvyyyV2zoM4RKlLw9XLPGjdBO7pUxQe9W4KVFTBGNOWTEtzN58 oNq9TM3C+yAh7+KotohUGOZoc8BKFJ8fv05tQw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeH0QCTIjW0JXmfWyHr51JH2I/bOScP5aijn+Q3TYl88z6bG6MW3V4Sz0wOl/GJ29Bo+zWN8Skc5eSA8Fp/Wk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1409:: with SMTP id u9mr10110045ljd.162.1570207235342; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <29713_1569428443_5D8B93DB_29713_96_1_6698a3d9-4ace-57fd-3b7c-7be23f135631@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <29713_1569428443_5D8B93DB_29713_96_1_6698a3d9-4ace-57fd-3b7c-7be23f135631@orange.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:40:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6dXiUmqEuOB+O_F2v2ab07mN73eRfVob5WM40+a5xKs2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007c85fb0594185c7c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/aUz3biDBkGkmT6D42aZq4nu_mBU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:40:39 -0000
Support (as co-author). Should draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00> be normative reference? Similarly, should draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-03 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment-03> be informative reference? Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:21 PM <julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote: > Hi PCE WG, > > In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there > for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now > like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be > the foundation for a PCE WG's work item? > > Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment > you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt > it. This poll will end on October 9. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
- [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment? julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Khasanov Boris
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Mach Chen
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Greg Mirsky
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… qinfengwei
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Jeff Tantsura
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Chengli (Cheng Li)