[Pce] Re: Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 October 2025 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9197ECC9E6 for <pce@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 03:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I11lWHRAwbFg for <pce@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 03:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911497ECC94D for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 03:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-592fd97c03eso1015799e87.1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 03:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761821184; x=1762425984; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T7G+5neaQFAxALb6bdSpHu8TNkDGrbwO9Ep7vVQWbo0=; b=QfBM24g3pOvwu5cJJFzIyWDPWH8uAcUthWLYBlKQ4lYakwlyHmLI6yZyEZtIG3yJgh titLLmELoD8ftxKxZqeTkdOsKg9M7bE6m094kuQxy45MJw2IAk8WmeUkZ3eVeFKmxF/I ZLx3yt2Ri2MIvvhf8Fr6ENmKGvpBdtFRgM9bA7MaRpoNPcH4BXQ8OMe4X0xby2HeziD2 NIodBLbUrtgxVt4Uf/yt2tR05DrOW62I6i2+Ll3YssN58QgC9PE1RIErdSbjfn+zcPwZ c9C0SeTJbIEOhg66fHAEJsZRrrvfDTJ2bgcIqy+v3Bi+PcBNVhzGlFAgIr0E8lDAE18k 2wXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761821184; x=1762425984; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=T7G+5neaQFAxALb6bdSpHu8TNkDGrbwO9Ep7vVQWbo0=; b=mM6m3E6baV+boeS3hx8B9YVdVH6MABrfxplSofEgFdv7a4LezmlTKDEeMUWc+DFS9r yJ4arX/KvsckjJcHQ7s75hy0AqXx2AKC9T75Cj8ZjINnB7ySjJxwvj9SmMbuBi0phnb4 vYmUvLnzDWoAQnbFOI0C0AS/grCki5Nw1pK6zaeG3T9Lp9zgIx7Of0ogtQNUp5fMSDhw RI3aNW4jvGeo4Use4klxvr8R/J57OoRnDQiSyxn7iJO/ddN75GF1SApwYRkMdopfBzGh 3avuK3p5V8Fd5CvJrpeY9Pt8MawPvByuvnNMoNSFnf7KzFMOEFFF0MhNSe08aF08UZAI aVgw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWBRRMVKjemmEghgw3jQTrVZIvCdMbeGegVSmx3quF13VCqRRQv+Sko4/4Q6XdGDLIZ5KE=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyXURAFtkbhtFGNnVzEGNAM5OONVM+HMbtRIurWzBTboCU3XRu9 tll/jufB5uwHJr2XecbixXbj2M/PvEGhCFBYtb6BHfF2l9MDeNc+x/ui898L0U0cVyJo2GwVBxL LSno9izaiCGj1MuoTL5X3UIDrDolQr0Y=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfcg6YgXRsmx2vSxrA6J+TO/Xr4hwFJmqKooAFgg/uUeYxAmME6cOGEtyGAEI Sg0Us7VDTCjtOZjD3eQEBkP69j/KkD3fZmpeB37UcdFBbISoM7dHMyZvkB9Tc8KZzGlL0ni2WgX hu+XqWWFmx2o7yTB+WHLlP0uTvunqqzjSWNEai7+w5c+i+4nZNei/Q1YxLDc2VpmymKsMA/F9xZ zbBk3nvE0yGa5c/hJQw5XdvzKWmSdrmZu8v/iCZthj5g8EqcChg9Fxi3lvFwGjlZwL6ceMoq6R/ TnPCBs+PnpFL0uLelwqsZhXdsxXf5/hEROAJFD/NSJ02/a7n1iFu/PL86BDaxANKLyMlS4xAmNf ZlkhdTfus7moWY0++zGaBFTgN32Sph/lQQTPMpxWQDCMjMYYt1ioBYhRs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFneG7AnH4nE08mbbdsWV0OVXrethwHXmhscSZ8w63zN5asNORchaGSw7t7wDrvHJ2HaDUNpi/6mR/SHfmeUb8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:4015:b0:577:285f:32bd with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-59416eced92mr756953e87.26.1761821183884; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 03:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5bLJEv=16ziB=maRhtg2BJnurZVBkxd2q8NgXG88=9Y6A@mail.gmail.com> <IA0PR11MB7792F763E73CD5A8B4F98B63D0FBA@IA0PR11MB7792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAP7zK5acc7YcWwj5iiivMa88SXQoBDuEG=fDBUKO24f2=aQ+UQ@mail.gmail.com> <IA0PR11MB7792ABB60E1779177759704FD0FBA@IA0PR11MB7792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAP7zK5Y-FEWwhaWYYEhKk0201ML=uWY8GD3ZXJz=BbaW5Dvy4w@mail.gmail.com> <IA0PR11MB7792395F0CDDDED971922BDED0FBA@IA0PR11MB7792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <IA0PR11MB7792395F0CDDDED971922BDED0FBA@IA0PR11MB7792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:45:45 +0000
X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_blUmot5FQ2sYulhYHQHq8PqZ7O_wf9e6MzPzy0-A-clh8TBTNNTMygXDTM
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4u5nLhWFb86L4ZPUbtUprv1LbV=nmS8wpp77sRC1LM9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Samuel Sidor (ssidor)" <ssidor=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2c15d06425df5f8"
Message-ID-Hash: WBAMRECVWDGLREXIAXIFUH7W6FMOZAYI
X-Message-ID-Hash: WBAMRECVWDGLREXIAXIFUH7W6FMOZAYI
X-MailFrom: dhruv.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/bWvKU1cxFJ4lf7GsTnXiOuzeFbU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

I meant what happens when P=1, F=0 and P=0, F=1 as that's not on the list.
Sorry I was not clear!

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:42 AM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi Dhruv,
>
> "Default Behavior (TLV present, no flags set)” is P=0 and F=0. Or am I
> missing something? I planned to keep original statement indicating what
> should happen if TLV is not included at all, so list is covering only cases
> with TLV included.
>
> Thanks,
> Samuel
>
> *From: *Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 30 October 2025 at 11:36
> *To: *Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>,
> draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions@ietf.org <
> draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Shepherd Review of
> draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:09 AM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dhruv,
> >
> > For “Dhruv: Yes! How about add an additional table to make it extra clear
> > and readable (only a minor suggestion) “.
> >
> > I void like to avoid having table (especially if it is supposed to have
> > all combinations to make sure that we will not end up  listing all
> > combinations in the future if more flags will be added), but I can still
> > try to change that section 4.2 to make it more structured, e.g. by
> > converting to bullets, what about something like this:
> >
> > …
> > The PATH-RECOMPUTATION TLV defines the recomputation behavior for an LSP
> > based on a default rule that can be further restricted by the P and F
> > flags, as follows:
> >
> >    - Default Behavior (TLV present, no flags set): The PCE MUST NOT
> >    recompute the path in response to various triggers if the current path
> >    remains valid and meets all constraints (E.g. topology updates,
> >    periodic reoptimization timers, or changes in the state of other LSPs)
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to pce-leave@ietf.org
>