[Pce] Number of front page authors

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 12 June 2019 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDAA12008A for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iL-7c3ycvi1 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FBC12006B for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5CLoB6g030376 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:50:11 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E7322044 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:50:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5242522042 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:50:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (25.129.51.84.dyn.plus.net [84.51.129.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5CLoAv9001075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:50:10 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:50:06 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <003a01d52168$ce72c0c0$6b584240$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdUhY+q1UvUUFMHeT+SStMreqxZP5w==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.51.129.25
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24672.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.874-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.874-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24672.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.874300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 7PAFk+T7u7ADYP7H+M1ZM1ldxqSi5bOJIVpGz/U+S0hayaoU89Fh9kI6 yzkbMpkW3V3DNnbIFdaaernOJKdgiNThl4QBS8PLuVFL9NtjSQKJwIfPR7J29KzDPPo2mHEVV5K x0vfvR3/qYmnWgshReUsvpJ9XUFGNmsfT7CKNmDWWsa/6SdAOX2AnS5DC8C5DkaEC8FJraL/yln FHVkfD0L+158fZ9kqRlCx8O73vIlJJI5ZUl647UDl/1fD/GopdyJ1gFgOMhOmLZAVphLW/bSq2r l3dzGQ1AkryZkOIkPo9r//mhEt3pM+IN0Ay4NKkkL6tcju9QgpLKIUNjsh1uIYHN7ApovsoHFVC 0MjT6Fzyk34ydCcXac6abqZc21MBQ6u32nlRQBOvcsTuUejg0omQ2vqumwAFVUH85vIcwrl2A/3 Nl4P8kQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/cyWBeVhZbUssjs2oFvGMDOYO9MA>
Subject: [Pce] Number of front page authors
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:50:16 -0000

Hi folk,

A couple of recent drafts have reached "late stages" with six or more names
on the front page.

The RFC editor has indicated that five is the reasonable maximum, and the
IESG asks that we stick to that apart from in exceptional circumstances.

That means that when we do the Shepherd Write-up we have to include a
justification if you want more names on the front page. If you don't give us
that justification, then you are going to have to sort out the front page
before the draft progresses.

I know that this can be painful and disappointing, but if you don't do it or
provide a good reason, then the chairs will just have to do it for you. I
suspect you would prefer the smaller pain to the radical solution we might
provide. So please get on top of this small piece of administrivia.

A useful tool for you would be to never add the sixth name in the first
place. That is easily and completely under your control and will make any
later decisions easier.

Thanks,
Adrian