[Pce] New draft to update IANA registration policy

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Mon, 22 July 2024 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB3DC14F6AB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ExG4quByvkni for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9056FC14F5F8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3dab3b85623so2618910b6e.2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1721683201; x=1722288001; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qvxCJD34SJAE3qIZD71iPPR4X5+rCIQrxxr4ZdvQVJQ=; b=CyV11rEk8HDgCgh4YQuYAyB6HGVLmOQ/iapHobJcmy5+uLaenHyAftZYgnjZFcexnU t58Ksgr+L15foJfBZR1Nk15nPadkiqFWyMrumovKjfFST8MT4Psn1KsYZXkStFc97dPA W5+tcjXPhdqZIBxgrD2B4HMwXq+RXlxtig0ntADv2IFUs6+ZyzcL5dDmQq66iUu/0tEy C7NwHc0WV+0VhYn8QCMM+JzxVUJa1NjbgdfDDz0ZzsGo4tJpRrJi3PqnVlQFbWqXt1X/ ZqnUQFuaZwH+6eDegI1XY6tkQsRYa4lidK5SmxnR+/zbbSGNGAgKgyNjqtVQBDc2/FAc wzmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721683201; x=1722288001; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qvxCJD34SJAE3qIZD71iPPR4X5+rCIQrxxr4ZdvQVJQ=; b=a+DCl/1OSvbb3lZSSB2WWbvzckVIEfKfSPm+yNNQSZtab7XKF2KCGpoWcheJMEBZyg dy+nB+Wg2BXsSSBYF4hUytc1m5EiXPhZ24N9t8ft3xo6jaKarUKt8c4cwhpTnHoDKwbk j+3LxloWVyQ4J5PFh3xeJylCInFzocJenaoj6YkmUF1p0yjeo4zdZKiAMD9KpelTzJy2 ylPwwbRjNZP3RAZExGBNn6GaUCce7Qfspx5xczvblHzBgFlbkCpOG50xINuej4mm05tC KkSlVMlsrF7IGX3iS2gh06Hmt8kOSpy7yQAHoHJ9MNND04LSd+TPvLPG4CSZcIGGuypU k1kA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzoQx5X2+FG3ZO78G6LCutEAP0U6W0eoEn8HLFbADANGBBZsH44 ZI9r4ojH8pAMJEqf8smW+udykiUlFQG9t2S3qIHQvyZjaMphWza/aLEVN6ROw8VMw3Y6r7fZhZN 3g81wBAVmmChCG2WyNEr+htjZ1JAEshImP3zdm81VEAHp710l6dXZEunj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDGqG21Qg4fxDXBErUZUP4gE1IjitXC/7Hm57XYfoq+4u+UxtrnQAwXGeap77U33JBlnejUOl1Ny8ggNGeuAw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1b08:b0:3d9:dfef:d7c8 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3dae9755e33mr9207776b6e.27.1721683201105; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:19:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5a4tnoG7qaRDyBmtnXDosqQnn=OibVMRo211FpwW63Mvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009e3e0c061ddc9b09"
Message-ID-Hash: GCZ6FOI2XITRHNG4UPLRD7WGAYPO6YRM
X-Message-ID-Hash: GCZ6FOI2XITRHNG4UPLRD7WGAYPO6YRM
X-MailFrom: dd@dhruvdhody.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] New draft to update IANA registration policy
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/d1zds1wrN391Xxv8zOFiDT3bsJ8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

I have written a small draft to update the registration policy for all
"standards action" to "IETF review" for PCEP registry.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/

The approach that the draft currently takes is to make a blanket change to
IETF-review for all "standards action" registry to allow experimental track
documents to request allocation. There are some registries where the space
is tight but IMHO IETF-review is fine -- our WG and LC process should be
enough to handle the case of less bits which ideally require creating a new
field/registry as we did in the past for LSP object flags!

Thoughts?

It might be a good idea to move this quickly as John suggested in his AD
review of Native-IP draft [1].

Thanks!
Dhruv

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xBn2_9E9vy6h5AnYEMMf3I9vbqM/