IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-08: (with DISCUSS)

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net> Thu, 27 June 2013 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6856221F9D01 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1LAvfUlUvZO for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db8lp0184.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5176621F9D4A for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail113-db8-R.bigfish.com (10.174.8.245) by DB8EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.174.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:35 +0000
Received: from mail113-db8 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail113-db8-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7618B1C039F for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.224.53; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -26
X-BigFish: VPS-26(zf7Izbb2dI98dI9371I1432I14ffIzz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839h944he5bhf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dc1h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail113-db8: domain of juniper.net designates 66.129.224.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.129.224.53; envelope-from=tnadeau@juniper.net; helo=P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ; -HQ.jnpr.net ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.245.197; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail113-db8 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail113-db8 (MessageSwitch) id 137233767290134_12026; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB8EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.8.225]) by mail113-db8.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110792600DD for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (66.129.224.53) by DB8EHSMHS010.bigfish.com (10.174.4.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:30 +0000
Received: from P-CLDFE02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.60) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:54:29 -0700
Received: from o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) by o365mail.juniper.net (172.24.192.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:54:28 -0700
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (216.32.181.186) by o365mail.juniper.net (207.17.137.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:06:20 -0700
Received: from mail32-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.242) by CH1EHSOBE011.bigfish.com (10.43.70.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:27 +0000
Received: from mail32-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail32-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EB33203B6 for <pce@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail32-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail32-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1372337664931685_29887; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.250]) by mail32-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070E2E00C8; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.245.197) by CH1EHSMHS007.bigfish.com (10.43.70.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:24 +0000
Received: from CH1PRD0511MB420.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.159]) by CH1PRD0511HT003.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.159.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0324.000; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:24 +0000
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-08: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHOczTW/A0D08+BiEeNuIW8F2pHFJlJQWqA
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CDF1AE09.26F9A%tnadeau@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <51CC34DA.9060202@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [10.255.159.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E6F7682CC5EA6842883CAD5308A00854@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%ORANGE.COM$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%12219$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%5$FQDN%onpremiseedge-1018244.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%o365mail.juniper.net
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:54:42 -0000

	I think the WG decided, as did the MPLS WG, to not mandate
read-write/create objects in MIBs any longer, in favor of Yang/NetConf.
However, if that is truly the case, then that begs the question, "where is
the Yang/Netconf module for this?"

	--Tom


On 6/27/13 8:49 AM, "Julien Meuric" <julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

>Hi all.
>
>I believe Benoit's following comment is interesting to the whole WG,
>beyond the reviewed I-D itself.
>
>Julien
>
>
>-------- Message original --------
>De :     Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
>
>[...]
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>DISCUSS:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I agree with Joel. Section 3.3 GMPLS PCE Management is really too weak
>for a requirement document.
>It sounds like: "hey, let's put a MIB to satisfy the OPS ADs."
>Are you really going to manage GMPLS PCE deployment with a read-only MIB
>module.
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-04 and RFC 4802 are
>both read-only.
>This section is not about management, it's just monitoring.
>The WG should review https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5706, and tell us how
>they plan on "managing" GMPLS PCE?
>Please review https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5706#appendix-A, and answer
>the different questions.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pce mailing list
>Pce@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email