Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

["RAGHURAM, ASWATNARAYAN" <[e-mail]>]

Fully support this work. 
It removes the ambiguity regarding PCEP SRP object and the SP networks are using PCEP to manage congestion in the network.

Thanks

A.Raghuram
Lead Member of Technical Staff
Network Infrastructure and Services
AT&T Services, Inc.
200 S. Laurel Av, Room C5-2Z01, Middletown, NJ 07748
O 732.420.2471 | [e-mail]

This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note  FYI that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 11:07 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

Hi WG,

As instructed by our AD, I-D has been posted with the file name change
- draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dpce-2Dstateful-2Dflags_&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s=91BNww-5xjEjT9cA13b_ywxPLKqvcYH0IaQrtno4B3s&e=

The chairs request the WG to reaffirm that the WG supports the publication of the I-D by Friday 22nd Nov. We request you to be vocal to enable us to judge consensus (and justify it).

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien


On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:30 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags
>         Author          : Adrian Farrel
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt
>         Pages           : 6
>         Date            : 2019-11-07
>
> Abstract:
>    Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
>    (PCEP) to support stateful Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are
>    defined in RFC 8231.  One of the extensions is the Stateful PCE
>    Request Parameters (SRP) object.  That object includes a Flags field
>    that is a set of 32 bit flags, and RFC 8281 defines an IANA registry
>    for tracking assigned flags.  However, RFC 8231 does not explain how
>    an implementation should set unassigned flags in transmitted
>    messages, nor how an implementation should process unassigned,
>    unknown, or unsupported flags in received messages.
>
>    This document updates RFC 8231 by defining the correct behaviors.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.
> org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dpce-2Dstateful-2Dflags_&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMe
> MTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf
> 5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s=91BNww-5xjEjT9cA13b_ywxPLKqvcYH0IaQ
> rtno4B3s&e=
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_ht
> ml_draft-2Dietf-2Dpce-2Dstateful-2Dflags-2D00&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeM
> TSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf5
> AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s=0wGDNe62PW0D0_fc8DE7kRsjV9ms64HqL479
> UClA9WM&e= 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.
> org_doc_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dpce-2Dstateful-2Dflags-2D00&d=DwICAg&c=LFY
> Z-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4j
> WZGh4Pilf5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s=O37vCSzsbrDqJpcptvgE_rvbJl
> X67h4QP2jOTaIcUuw&e=
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=ftp-3A__ftp.ietf.org_intern
> et-2Ddrafts_&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTg
> APqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s
> =MebsZqdmFXhqWuDTwf1ll73AdeBezI1rV-55Yt6RWrM&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail
> man_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H
> 7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxc
> PY&s=ztlu4pan5lfBzTeYmBpdlOl4ftHrEUHpEr-ULsJ_FJw&e=

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[e-mail]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=4jWZGh4Pilf5AM78JB_cjXTMlAeCh8OHSOOzaEZxcPY&s=ztlu4pan5lfBzTeYmBpdlOl4ftHrEUHpEr-ULsJ_FJw&e=