IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with DISCUSS)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683F120402; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fN5vnWAA6UaT; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C057120272; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8FDD36DAA54B44CC9FA1; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:32:58 +0100 (IST)
Received: from BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.41) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:32:57 +0100
Received: from BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.50]) by BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:00:31 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: 'Barry Leiba' <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-association-group@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-association-group@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHVNunVFFWvtZARlEiTjYX9pnln96bDr1qA
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:30:30 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8DB19654@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <156274054523.15505.17994880377246642196.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156274054523.15505.17994880377246642196.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.76.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/eNn2VR-kJs2WhCb4vNftZupspHw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:33:03 -0000

Hi Barry, 

I have fixed this in my working copy with RFC 8051 as normative reference. Will publish the update when the submission tool reopens. 

Working Copy: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt
Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt

Regards,
Dhruv


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba via
> Datatracker
> Sent: 10 July 2019 12:06
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-
> group@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-
> 09: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-group/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> A tiny thing, trivial to fix:
> 
> — Section 2 —
> 
>    This document uses the following terms defined in [RFC8051]: Stateful
>    PCE, Active Stateful PCE, Passive Stateful PCE, and Delegation.
> 
> I think this makes 8051 a normative reference.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email