IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

julien.meuric@orange.com Fri, 26 March 2021 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4D13A1772 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GCjMvY8yLbe for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A453A23DB for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4F6TcR0Jytz5wJw for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:34:31 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1616780071; bh=LsMfxupN4Hrn9JpDuEYWa9IbJprj5+/+UA5mOQNatBc=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FRkT3IOZX17noA8aUhZwEnbqYPnMd8bcMo+uZ1wPK5c4TDNbTzRI1eau5Lgw+PbXk fzfmJphz17PJJhM2GqhC1Ui10d7+pv85sh4R3eHcPqHp1CGvzs1D2zO2FU8bRCSh8i iP2M074BnmjxHfIEKkFybozYNG8CHYlX9MCM3EJQvI9OViUKZPr0yzLnL+c4+T2D7V frSC8Ba+31E253w1fKuhrKbqzGDsS+Bn4vrPj+ETstXXS/bqeCpgZ0qtATdLhAm/t3 q6x05V2lE+U+t2M4OsHXySTxXpTCzaWWdVoVenQT0zLx1NxHZgDJUo11rxvuMDFinM ApAZSSqAgGnbg==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.54]) by opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4F6TcQ6j1QzDq80 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:34:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.192.148.54] (10.114.13.245) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:34:30 +0100
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <557499ee-62df-102e-3da4-7fd386b7ff98@orange.com>
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <8abf975b-339c-fe1d-b5a1-4cdb58ac1e9e@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:34:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <557499ee-62df-102e-3da4-7fd386b7ff98@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms000801030300000303010102"
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.245]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ecqoLxabdLhw-ka1ZIqOEm0ZMwg>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:34:41 -0000

Hi all,

After discussing with Tom and the authors, we believe that a reasonable
way to progress this early allocation is to postpone the allocation of
the error codes. We'll proceed accordingly.

Enjoy the week-end,

Dhruv & Julien


On 01/02/2021 11:54, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> We have received a request from the authors of
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp for an early code point allocation.
>
> RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>
> b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
> handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
> (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
> in an Internet-Draft.
> c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
> there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
> specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>
> If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
> believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
> reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If
> the chairs hear no objections by Monday, February 15th, we will kick off
> the early allocation request.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email