Re: [Pce] Proposed Implementation Policy for PCE WG

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

You still have a few days (till 24th) to raise any concerns with the
proposed implementation policy!

Thanks!
PCE Chairs


On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:01 PM Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> In discussion with our ADs and with other WG chairs in the Routing
> Area, the PCE chairs have decided that it would be good for the
> working group to have a stated policy about what implementation is
> needed, desired, or required before a draft can advance for
> publication as an RFC. The full range of options is available from "no
> implementation required" up to "multiple independent and
> inter-operable implementations required". The purposes are to help
> ensure quality and implementable RFCs, to make sure that our work is
> truly relevant and needed, and to understand the relative priorities
> of our work.
>
> The chairs briefly mentioned this at the IETF 104 PCE WG meeting, and
> we promised to start a discussion on what 'Implementation Policy' to
> set for the PCE WG.
>
> This is a subject for the WG to decide through the usual rough
> consensus, but the chairs would like to start the discussion with a
> proposal as follows -
>
> "All WG I-Ds are required to include an 'Implementation Status'
> Section (as per RFC7942) to document known existing or planned
> implementations. The chairs can make exceptions on a per-document
> basis."
>
> Please raise any concern with the proposed implementation policy by
> 24th April 2019.
>
> Thanks!
> Adrian, Dhruv & Julien