Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pceps-07 available

[DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tom,

Apologies for the delay (other urgent requests piling up…) Dhruv has just reminded me of this comment of yours. I think you are right: It is much better to maintain symmetry in the TLS verification and use a general term that includes both peers. I’ll upload an updated version right now.

Be goode,

On 3 Feb 2016, at 18:06 , t.petch <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Diego

Looks good with one slight query.  I commented before on the use of
'client' in s.3.5 which suggested an asymmetric protocol, where the PCE
checks on the PCC needed to be more stringent that those of the PCC on
the PCE.  I notice that one of the 'client' has gone but one has not and
there is still a 'PCC' in there so it still to me carries the flavour
that PCE checking of the PCC is more important than the other way round.
I do not know if this is ok or not, how it lines up with the threat
model.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
To: <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:07 PM

Hi,

We have just uploaded a new version of draft-ietf-pce-pceps
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps/)

We believe this new version addresses all the comments received from the
SECDIR review after the last call period, and other pending ones
provided by Tom while that SECDIR review was taking place. As far as the
authors can say, the document is ready to progress.

Be goode,

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: [e-mail]
Tel:    [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
----------------------------------



--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: [e-mail]
Tel:    [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
----------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição