IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

"Weiqiang Cheng" <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Sun, 01 September 2019 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD13A120024; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 06:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDYAt2dkkCng; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 06:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB99C12000F; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 06:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45d6bc30c709-20c23; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:09:35 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45d6bc30c709-20c23
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[111.32.143.119]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45d6bc30e9b4-4c485; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:09:35 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45d6bc30e9b4-4c485
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'pce-chairs' <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn44Q8Y_eeGDfV+ecojJt0gKd9zHU4B7V0Xn_PYneCQAeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn44Q8Y_eeGDfV+ecojJt0gKd9zHU4B7V0Xn_PYneCQAeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 21:09:34 +0800
Message-ID: <001c01d560c6$80bd7a30$82386e90$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdVXfwyHtDl5QTKWSKy5ndCvD+ZQ/QJRx1hw
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/f00Cj0F-v6_1l7EHdHGibHyzkaw>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 13:09:58 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft.

B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2019年8月21日 01:45
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 [1].

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

One of the chairs did a pre-adoption review [2] and authors posted a new
revision. Note that there are known implementations.

This adoption poll will end on 6th September 2019.

Thanks!
Dhruv (for the chairs)


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oaBIRA9FnNsV6-JrKKRCdwtLysk

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email