[Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8664 (6753)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 25 November 2021 08:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1A33A1013
for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:51:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id sIm_dJKskv50 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:51:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04503A0CCE
for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499)
id 8A173217882; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:51:43 -0800 (PST)
To: msiva@cisco.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com,
wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com,
aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com,
dd@dhruvdhody.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: pengshuping@huawei.com, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20211125085143.8A173217882@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/fAkaANX-PQtziGEH_AMyLxlTgn0>
Subject: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8664 (6753)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>,
<mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>,
<mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:51:50 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8664, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6753 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Shuping Peng <pengshuping@huawei.com> Section: 4.3.1 Original Text ------------- If the F bit is set to zero (see below), then the NT field has no meaning and MUST be ignored by the receiver. Corrected Text -------------- If the F bit is set to one (see below), then the NT field has no meaning and MUST be ignored by the receiver. Notes ----- Later it says, when this F bit is set to 1, the NAI value is absent, so the NT field has no meaning. F: When this bit is set to 1, the NAI value in the subobject body is absent. The F bit MUST be set to 1 if NT=0; otherwise, it MUST be set to zero. The S and F bits MUST NOT both be set to 1. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8664 (draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing Publication Date : December 2019 Author(s) : S. Sivabalan, C. Filsfils, J. Tantsura, W. Henderickx, J. Hardwick Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8664 (6753) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8664 (67… Dhruv Dhody