[Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 November 2023 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE91C14CE5F; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 04:58:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.15.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <170134913111.27263.1211212697082930483@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 04:58:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/flHzQCp-UDs-lMwI0NU-a-VQb9I>
Subject: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:58:51 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-pce-07-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-pce/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Like Martin, I suggest to add some text around collaboration with the CATS WG.

May I also suggest adding that all work items have an intended status of "standards track" ?