[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 25 August 2017 13:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E411326EA; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp@ietf.org, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com, pce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150366827632.19597.4644415881212125958.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:37:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/fl_4Z7yW1E6aMC6nRdvi_HfWKBs>
Subject: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:37:56 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) I'm wondering why this spec is not part of I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce as it is also not published yet...? 2) I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations should also be a normative references, given a flag is used in section 4.1 and a TLV is used in section 5.3.2 that are defined in that draft. 3) sec 5.4: "A PLSP-ID of zero removes all LSPs that were initiated by the PCE." and "If the PLSP-ID specified in the PCInitiate message was not created by a PCE.." -> This means that the PCC must remember which LSP was created by which PCE at instantiation time. This could be stated more explicitly.
- [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Julien Meuric