Re: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 30 November 2023 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A59C14F739; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:36:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnpFa8cjDAcx; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E289C14F748; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7c4c21eed8aso405042241.1; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:36:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701369368; x=1701974168; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JyB024DImFHeCsNVaSoNiKVhko+VHhFl+mnnZxX09Uw=; b=XAzemct5NyEnHQQjmzm6y8dW8hIDHJCQJFqcQp0hjRcdhQBcI5jXMg8oxBii1kxsrC w5137HYG9aeGmADFJG3ppQaUvLxq/MiTMbVbDG+oO86eU7r2SEkiE7rkGPWztvZTvbkW PhPUx9/SNVfsHRjtvTN6cCCdgndOUCZU9zTanhbLvMF7TjEZWeDHi4bhxwQHCHAoMudh UBcB31AilslSgP34IF7zDhv9DFFpuwGRRzN4AtbPEK+ytWhd/CcBcQLHqVDnvcpoKyH0 F4Ta8cKth+aTfF690qfytW/PDt2M0pF4rIAnME9DnPnH6Y+yeZJ4OnFKtMofGNLVDsha LC6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701369368; x=1701974168; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JyB024DImFHeCsNVaSoNiKVhko+VHhFl+mnnZxX09Uw=; b=Efc1Yct3Rr2b99MhBO3Qq4TYzcjWQ7hRFUyjSCP5w37XbihXQ2ZFuh27hYyklZtyvy Eu48LK3UHtrHTR7JWL0XNAkL+VZw6/c8tf2XkE+kwoN/sPYgouAzAFzFyyXt3sFhI9hJ Jkc4sBuA39ZNdjZhn10cZsEGX7BDPF22V/7Rpmkts4rY0yW+gpC9jRMa+waLHUXwx1qb LMMtDWh6pp2bM9KD4WX+UT/j7Piugf1nYOlDrmpSDa7ai1rGq2GIT3qZhThqSgJwvzJP QDRpKYG3oz56cX6wV0rkLlHJQEKtGJdWFhkBljSGdCRYoucdzAb00VAz8mRLdJ6RLxRb uOkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy+xQFKIwC1VH4dA8ktba7f4iQT9zG0wGdtEHcb042VfoBtbaiF 6Pl0VuCnatewPl17Kt99DvjoSvaPgLdToSt+fB0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7j44ainUePdHVmtPi4o8Nm1YNxr18YCOrQqkG7n2zYWLDSshciDc/E7VfYThAGSxO3mV+26eELJ23NJRzDbU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e9ca:0:b0:464:63dc:bd06 with SMTP id q10-20020a67e9ca000000b0046463dcbd06mr533145vso.2.1701369368063; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:36:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170111133534.26231.9409408152317884407@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAP7zK5aywYcOWxxX75zZEqqt465n9DnwK2W1ygP0c1iY=POvrA@mail.gmail.com> <CEF0269F-409B-4E33-94F6-118E8A7C1C79@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CEF0269F-409B-4E33-94F6-118E8A7C1C79@juniper.net>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:35:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRPzLeHHZUdFZtAQZ9BZm4+Pzp1vDzfdkQLaxx4eig42A@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0b158060b62ec93"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/gR6_7WzxAe_hmje-soXzfpMLaSo>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:36:13 -0000

Thank you!

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:33 AM John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> > On Nov 27, 2023, at 11:17 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dhruv: Yes if PCEP is being used for such synchronization. One could say
> its implicit in stateful PCE, but may be we can make it explicit -
> >
> > Definition of the PCEP extensions used by a stateful PCE for
> > recommending a new path for an existing or new LSP to the PCC/PCE.
> > Further protocol extensions must cover the case where the receiving
> > PCC/PCE chooses not to follow the recommendation. The PCEP
> > extensions for state synchronization are also in scope.
>
> I made this change.
>
> —John
>
>