Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

I Support the publication.

-Qin
________________________________
吴钦 Qin
Mobile：+86-13914734360<tel:+86-13914734360>(Mobile Number)
Email：bill.wu@huawei.com<mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>

发件人： Jonathan Hardwick<Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
收件人： Dhruv Dhody<dhruv.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>>;pce<pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>>
主题： Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt
时间： 2019-11-09 16:54:23

I support publication.
Cheers
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: 08 November 2019 16:07
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

Hi WG,

As instructed by our AD, I-D has been posted with the file name change
- draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags/

The chairs request the WG to reaffirm that the WG supports the publication of the I-D by Friday 22nd Nov. We request you to be vocal to enable us to judge consensus (and justify it).

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:30 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags
>         Author          : Adrian Farrel
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt
>         Pages           : 6
>         Date            : 2019-11-07
>
> Abstract:
>    Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
>    (PCEP) to support stateful Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are
>    defined in RFC 8231.  One of the extensions is the Stateful PCE
>    Request Parameters (SRP) object.  That object includes a Flags field
>    that is a set of 32 bit flags, and RFC 8281 defines an IANA registry
>    for tracking assigned flags.  However, RFC 8231 does not explain how
>    an implementation should set unassigned flags in transmitted
>    messages, nor how an implementation should process unassigned,
>    unknown, or unsupported flags in received messages.
>
>    This document updates RFC 8231 by defining the correct behaviors.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce