Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 03 April 2021 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DE3A1A7D; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzuFJGjryMcq; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C40873A1A7E; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id ot17-20020a17090b3b51b0290109c9ac3c34so5411995pjb.4; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 21:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l7NwH3UMoYxGgmHjpRqt6WdbxiBBdxd5ajem4ZpbnPk=; b=nRRlpFNqQlJJDZN3V0xiU6/4PpycuzXvihho2veNAVN+to7PhqIiIYo/Hflf73WbZX 7/yjaCnGPuZl1ebQMcdxZkVZHEX/ZEZNQwguEo3/JXlh62UIt/R3eKGxJVW2jpaJwZhj bo917K1P1yZrenTU0qhodRMc0tAKf0Eh9s+Za7V4LcvYbwPfnuayEvghZU/fC68LcymY VC5XpdqjhR4q3P9E+gOxpMQjvH7D6GtL+jQoL9rbdHRVaSdc9Vw5D1r6JVNViLaIcMFG hW+oj6ENpUmW2wzW9Y1BtBzHe3yVyy9wfRfAsQNPm+XeugCognGqYjWksWNGPHC9jM+O H5vQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l7NwH3UMoYxGgmHjpRqt6WdbxiBBdxd5ajem4ZpbnPk=; b=sGRN+/t2ZT16zFbmxzT7Xmp9pQ/irrxK+1aK6qTqAPUwoAmw8MDiqKyOXU8IK754zY nnkVsdCZHBLahC9MZcZxpOOpi3OI7qGBu6d6Bj1ML4+KxyKtIW1W4r2gvW2QibIPwdvN ZHUzwi2jTMvBgnl7BrYPPJSfzxl77gTPEvGTvf2H8MouPqVPV8ewIVnEDK5mL5Nvy50t /7/dpGYSnKua0P7b4EhRf9NaqkcERAz72kZIBKXWNLJjVFkywqJz/38rtbEoFhlM69fa Fiiy7dzQkC6ZNXs/ZFlSyl23D6oMvaUXVvmgVLXoyQ9++KOLRzmF7Y1Lnm+EEsmRvx3m u/Ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ljxtwR812WISnLZ0LqDR1/vjjB5VCmXShmd4K4uumVj/dTTny 3OtHT+Hh96db6s9+O1sAgKGVf5lIb03cGafguqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLLRI/bxL3zDnwAQ7NwjE83ByMR+Msoh3Q9au8wq9DHni8JHeSOyomU2s1VMMvlSajZsKW2RgiCt44XjaKEh4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6e44:: with SMTP id s4mr16134612pjm.112.1617425384301; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 21:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <64B123AD47B4514BA507B0376760B284017793E65B@MAIL-MBX-05> <007a01d7275f$7de97ff0$79bc7fd0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <007a01d7275f$7de97ff0$79bc7fd0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 00:49:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0U+=vyyjtE+CFAYfD5RjRG4776F4aRnLjZxCCsWHbgqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, "박춘걸(Naas Transformation 팀)" <peter.park@kt.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b68cd05bf0a3151"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/h_jVADyuJ9GXkfJSISlxee9TI3U>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 04:49:51 -0000

Hi Aijun

That’s great to here interest from operators in PCEP-LS!

Kind Regards

Gyan
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:30 PM Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Also as a telco, we are expecting the implementation of PCEP-LS, and once
> it is ready, we will try to deploy it in the network.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Aijun Wang
>
> China Telecom
>
>
>
> *From:* pce-bounces@ietf.org <pce-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *???(Naas
> Transformation ?)
> *Sent:* Friday, April 2, 2021 9:14 AM
> *To:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>; pce@ietf.org;
> draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>;
> Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> *Subject:* Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
>
>
>
> Dear Gyan,
>
>
>
> As a telco, we are interested in the upgrade of PCEP.
>
> PCEP and H-PCE scenarios is always being considered as valuable tools for
> solving our issues in telco’s multi-domain environment.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:36 AM
> *To:* pce@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <
> dd@dhruvdhody.com>; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> *Subject:* [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
>
>
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
>
>
> We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap
> and a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE
> were highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused.
>
>
>
> This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and
> development efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing
> mechanisms. There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of
> PCEP sessions for this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it
> may not be useful to rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite
> protocol :). What would be useful would be - finding out if there is still
> interest in this experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong
> technical objections for the experiment in its limited scope etc...
>
>
>
> As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments
> and expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well
> as impact in other protocols and the network, etc.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gyan (on behalf of co-authors)
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf
>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
>
> ==
>
>
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에
> 포함된 정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못
> 전송된 경우, 발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다.
> This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
> material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you
> receive this email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing,
> distributing or retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately.
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*