Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293C81202E5; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9lagOiqIJNfe; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x130.google.com (mail-it1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19E4120254; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x130.google.com with SMTP id i63so64849ita.3; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bI2zZAQrjUup+W2weNH5phwmUIKCHhxfGMAmMdtBwl8=; b=UtMuIY7OvY7tJv8lnk4IHQ9P2Znq92FCQJQsOEKK2DpHubimcJb5MLVi1lDpsyEK39 kXejKFuBUBeDDx1qPUfXrt6eP5+btxa+lBevVaz3nAVA7gaqomAN4ZIMl5eNfRgSmvk6 wiryx/hQ1zyr1byLuZjdy3yjW8jq3BnWWUo/QISzVHV60pVNBd+Z68SciY/7MZWOY/Cd SbHiMivFHn+LBB6tBtjHI6k8oKXV6ibA54RFKdPLy5Tn8yoWFZXx/mVQDn81LUBGRSVN T2eFygRabnCDB6/iEgj1VsdVrVWYueyMXXD/CPK4gvHg4Dr6pNZNA1+bhFSHzTd5RT3z +baw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bI2zZAQrjUup+W2weNH5phwmUIKCHhxfGMAmMdtBwl8=; b=fiLsTLoGaUc9rpW9qAvQn4ce3azk0EN+fVGY1oBzJlMn/ZoGsnVubUvlDflQiZQCMR AbCjjd08Qcki6f6dM1+T5MAoMZyaJERReIoAURagLLmSetltsZIyxjVlaBmkMFPklRw3 EwZmBDxvhbWDbNE1W0lGRCLjBesG8jcZJrPzEGsm5yLufRbaA2k+9KeA4Ky8TufrVUCT xlko4YaFL9mnfjwlMQ34HmlYyK7rU10HFDY9SPpJk+ZpBUU84D84e8S6X8hohjx3Srbo dfjmasomNrxn/uSzinoyuvjk02Ka4OERaPWwXNH4jHsI30UYT5uL4u9450eBTf/yNpv6 JfCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8vZsBbpfnWBp0/MNexggnNWd1AAXf/iN4ieUMf3Tv+lGXtaY0 0FjdmUrSW5wgnDPYm63l6MK3GtU2Mx+k1IEnV1o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyWz/AfM1PTlcqTR1ZEQotS2JdzUfvC5usVB38BZMmvE4p0+KvCVxbUYXmzhhalozPG7KqUFzPkgaEB+g5s5nY=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:5143:: with SMTP id s64mr28162956jaa.54.1557926830078; Wed, 15 May 2019 06:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155792454764.17625.18205220641029349549.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155792454764.17625.18205220641029349549.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:56:33 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5Kai-aGGGiCGOm4fWg8QXe_qU3QfG+2WepJ19fDiONmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/iFvkgN4sgX0EoR7P1oZuqgL8zQU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 13:27:19 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Responding to this comment -

> (2) The Shepherd's writeup mentions the existence of "commercial as well as
> open source implementations" -- these are documented in Appendix A.  What code
> points are used in those implementation?  Is the code deployed (in production)?
>  I'm asking because all the code points (except the ones defined in this
> document, of course) have not been assigned by IANA...and have to wonder about
> potential collision (or even squatting).
>
> [I realize the Authors may not have an answer available...it would be very nice
> if someone (Authors/Shepherd/Chair/AD/anyone) would check.  There might be
> nothing to worry about; better safe than sorry.]
>

For the implementations I am aware of and remember, the code is not
deployed in production yet and the experimental code points was used
(as per RFC8356 where possible), with the plan to update the code once
IANA allocation is done. I will re-check.

Thanks!
Dhruv (Shepherd)