IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07123A0D39; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kY9F39JGVG4Q; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC733A0CFA; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id f23so1581696iof.6; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F49X6sNckR/hGhR3awGyWcDMDgpk3Y+mkf+w+Bx+rVg=; b=O3vuEcq0Vwv/RL7JLgLvlU2hz8/hzDnkG/fZ/69roN/kaP4L1BG+Wx7LuK+yKK5tbs DFaJMgHpqWf/sHzmf2OXaaqB4G/K35RPj62/kbPGZlPwE2Nwzj2CkjfvEcERUqxrBEWS RQtRDDeQdvQpKeZxgxGeOzVw0zBVzy5gknsobSwrQu4xlpd0aXzg0Iq85Pq1++Kje4ko +Xli3zFqW5Xyh5L3p0gjzG0lnl1avWAuomHoLDEd4io/pVydp1QZ9I0fWfCWNxxv5/ln rSfx/jItcj20ZTiUlKWBdYpKjSRW/9T9Cq7cci22xJiWKHA7UntmuH0ISzrtw1Ak/mbk 06QQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F49X6sNckR/hGhR3awGyWcDMDgpk3Y+mkf+w+Bx+rVg=; b=a+B+YbDY/WkukyNkpItAwZ++btjtVXGp/pPU/5p6RznHhoa/0/XluF8WpTKygZgHSI uHsF7ZDQjeptcB494VEhd4l3KUTqCnKWwILtxZsJuGCbZ5GYgpExWM2sPl6t37EPQNyb kqHgUOFaqPYjmShOVcOmVa6SK/QDQgzmzCYxDGvCM+aYCvd7SHduV1M2Wk3s05EZH8Ux Auk3D5aTOb9/l5gEqK3jBLXTN5Hv1EktxVdHVRIXXf3sY0jXCu3mfUcKpwdqMygRvb7S bQaRF7M/8EI47TkPHtHPpeGN4AnUIYnigSthqTnu0P7HCVvKO9yiHDqpixtvWs00uCVC 47nA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532spGGz7e1fRYU3gQFbZa2McKONWqlSAoK+LeTgAYxhyzDacu2/ nhSUVKK56L/78wEOBCr4vfjMuByNeTjXEuYrfVPMpgatGCU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2IOvtjQA4OhgtCbWm/2jpvxZYmo68jmJa4yNUZ0RRME4id8XYnY7yDBjcKWddOUToKCTfFcP+INZc0oMd5xE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:1405:: with SMTP id k5mr27661742jad.108.1592995425193; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 03:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:13:08 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4NkaZ-nPL7YGO4KifVT4skOV0pue0ptbnusQYvpWa4DA@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/jCCXo-YVwX-kcMk5EAjpRlgCgWM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:43:48 -0000

Hi WG,

Thanks to all who responded to the adoption poll. We have support to
adopt this as a WG item. Please continue to provide your comments as
the document moves through the WG process.

Authors, please post a -00 version
'draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-00' with only the name/date
change, and be sure to set the "replaces" option during submission.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien


On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:15 PM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
> the list.
>
> This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email