[Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (5796)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 13 July 2020 20:34 UTC

To: chillol@juniper.net, edward.crabbe@oracle.com, inaminei@google.com, jmedved@cisco.com, robert.varga@pantheon.tech
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200713203402.28B5EF4074E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:34:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/jqPZ8AgeAHmHmQa6Se10LQKTtKs>
Subject: [Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (5796)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8231, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5796

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Hillol <chillol@juniper.net>
Date Reported: 2019-07-29
Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG)

Section: 7.3.3

Original Text
-------------
               Value      Description
               -----      -------------------------------------
                 1        Unknown reason
                 2        Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs
                 3        Too many pending LSP Update Requests
                 4        Unacceptable parameters
                 5        Internal error
                 6        LSP administratively brought down
                 7        LSP preempted
                 8        RSVP signaling error

Corrected Text
--------------
Remove Value 2
 2        Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs

Notes
-----
Value 2 "Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs" can occur when an PC update message comes for either PCInitiated or PCDelegated LSP. But since the lsp is already created or delegated, it means the resource is available and allocated. Also RFC 8281 (section 5.3) states that if LSP provisioned exceeds the limit, an LSP error message should be sent with Error-type=19 (Invalid Operation) and
Error-value=6 (PCE-initiated LSP limit reached). So, I believe there is no scenario where LSP Error code TLV "Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs" would be used.
Please let me know if there is some scenario which can trigger the same.

--------------------------------------
RFC8231 (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-21)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE
Publication Date    : September 2017
Author(s)           : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, J. Medved, R. Varga
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8231 (… RFC Errata System