[Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Wed, 13 January 2021 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4172E3A10BE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:47:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 407Vh31hCgDS for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A103A0E1C for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id l23so1343228pjg.1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:47:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/ic3UMu6xcayGcFuxpR+HwGtTqpETJcqWlYs+u92gcE=; b=CMnyOM4X25MLLtXUR6uQVsQGVrWJhSSvRA0b9wnDXbuD/HNuvotJTcQVHgESHhlANq jXuMwBLuXWjq88Lu9ICpecr3qh2VOXcGgYTyNpLVDOZtRclipfenCHt2rzTEecZiFB+6 lZOt+fWRwTdu5QMM+llX8/OZvmxhkbNDyMH1tHbGTAonmkv3/Ws12LgSWcLNNxoFw+F5 UBjvM8QUfazgxljYd6gfu0PMvsQvSy5zqxyVtyQXUv2nYfKrYtAt2V6zehlDyHrIs9SW g+GfOXyQublukNpb642whfVqqPGPu1+U23nxUJzO3mxEP/hO8xHrb3yLI3OYoRSXAOpR SFbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/ic3UMu6xcayGcFuxpR+HwGtTqpETJcqWlYs+u92gcE=; b=F3vg4aBe18fpZiz6+SoIktfVjsVSj4Mll/EtdniujJbXViOqiJwVzzuwksMYGjxQoU K3cXkEIxMjXfTibL83jwEjLXE4CiXhqMdfwko82naeQJkML7fZoab+rBF5YUNmwsLFsB l+9kR20OEdCIUKtxy/QA2ZdHL+Pegd4poOnwHE7fWwX5Fan7iEbhAaPSeTU60y4lnXyU VRR3N+xUFzBebqsteVPSgT3nWqAMCYhk6aq7Y1cxcJGYqdetqsimlC9PcRsidr+in9BI aoWn8QY5A8RaXvt76KBehPqFUHEf24J7yk1JnKzzAa7EVOI4dRlzhJ4bw3vdnoyaVJNV S5rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FSquqUsDvi7fMV3u5Tpq1BXJDjpHUv0OZGxcIFVYK+kWSSQwN TkHmm1ZwAs7ymbpmxA4YtCAmAUaJjrxLcU1sIPHgNlezS7d7oC7x
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzerpbK9RMMut4LNsr8rHaJXdpF1DDyui11UrSYT7AMXCL+2/6lgxZ28y9kPemnioO5LkTtV+3heeYOf78PqaQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d18c:: with SMTP id fu12mr2911706pjb.50.1610549234680; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 06:47:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:16:38 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5ZbOpSkvRT7xGp-RdhfqX9jXBsn77H-6AD4prEvazx5Yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/jtYnXH6Ti2EVtqZbmRU_RLaLe4w>
Subject: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:47:18 -0000

Hi WG,

We have received a request from the authors of
draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement for an early code point allocation.

RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:

   b.  The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
       handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
       (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
       in an Internet-Draft.
   c.  The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
       there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
       specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.

If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining the
reasons.  If the chairs hear no objections by Monday, Jan 25th, we
will kick off the early allocation request.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien