IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FADC3A0CC9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UBgByTpyJ0Z for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642B43A0CE4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id b17so958060pji.1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=74zf7fxGvUGrDWw6uiHWsLIxLc1jud//f8mW17YBmnc=; b=2S6haTRW7rvYUnxabHQGaAjrv8kjUbdM/98mgyVggGUnyeT9QNFMdVcmcvVrB4Mgxa ytX+RvzDss3cyppvN+7pt+dis+oBKLCfWACqj3J11K92+Sz5j+DkiAgT/9fPObWkVCNs CT/sIoR+X8s+bD4hYaddcozaIrwgPIpvPRnSZnUvPaMrMBn5I/DwXQvm+VI3VFx5zFzy IJkLAl+/O04PgkTbB3cY8xps40zENmBESPMi6sSbOVdid6sJ4P/uS11wQ/UtU3vVtDc/ Vdy+Otvn6hdtlU2cDwv2Q1sj2MDArFuvu94QxZFYiOuXqEnQnnnS0ZY7h4c/ImKJ/GJB rJcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=74zf7fxGvUGrDWw6uiHWsLIxLc1jud//f8mW17YBmnc=; b=EeP9hvvipSCG336EOZRKN/PrUKfopF0rXNk8FBgQJ95IGZ3Y4VLVFCiJyT93RMuufD o+gO0jGV+FFHtE4dSKeBSHPdadhBXQz7n9HIn9u2taRqYMTdBFT/59FBg94bxv/nMPgo lfHetcX9/hEv6bCqmC04y3IzWZXGC17hOc4H8Kr4n+9/P6sFaBYzskztitaKEesPwboI /A6w0UZ5RgT0sc4PCSgMdAl1q/0Bx0elyqFfZNaCILSp4ziWsbrF6yulZEehtoSg8Lmw E/ncYugY8MqAFomxBnmqpXeZDoYFjihmnQ2I2ltYepkNvHUtIhmLRnG1r2sI0EhcTq2B L5jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OosDOYtEBUwF6lE0CBhID4ndoDtJSKc2oneJlbaY2JQZaWzGF KetCYeF2fuWJb+tl2CaRJLuMglK0s0PK9eMggN7/j9OQLy66Qw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCjQyYGNMX3dqJldNPu0PSD7HsGXOrCM78Np8pl9I3sCdzTFPCBC2DuJ7ouqX2ifqJAEv+0IrxzMD5vFbH5oI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d90c:: with SMTP id c12mr7622849pjv.94.1600335761564; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 02:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5YoAAwu4hshZpzQpam3urNQUHwrZLm3Urw0q6-g+PDGdQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5YoAAwu4hshZpzQpam3urNQUHwrZLm3Urw0q6-g+PDGdQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:12:05 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5bhDGq+DYU3m2Rvh4ZtVxyNB62vVTzVzD0YGwdVPkyryg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy@ietf.org, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/kY5FZVHUikpjjnEQBQGM-cNiotM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:42:44 -0000

Hi WG,

A reminder to the WG to be more vocal. I am copying this slide from
the chair's WG status slide
[https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-pce-1-introduction-01]

> Please be Vocal
>
> o During WG Adoption and WG LC calls, the response is less.
>
> o Please be vocal on the list to help us gauge the consensus better.
>
> o The working group mailing lists are looked at by the IESG, IAB, and others (internal and external to IETF) to determine interest/participation level in our standards process.
>
> o Please review ideas from your peers, these are community outputs of the working group as a whole.
>

The WG LC for the draft in question ends on Monday 21st Sept. Please
respond with your explicit support (or not) for its publication.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien



On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1].  Please indicate your support
> or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
> the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it,
> please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready
> for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits
> are most welcome.
>
> The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020.
>
> Thanks,
> Dhruv & Julien
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email