Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <> Thu, 30 November 2023 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376EC151701 for <>; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:12:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOTkwVKohDaM for <>; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58EF9C14CE5F for <>; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7c461a8684fso291193241.2 for <>; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:12:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20230601; t=1701349922; x=1701954722;; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oSNDpcU55dh2tGtwPBNknCqbvnkho5WeNFrgIGdgoMQ=; b=HeEbyxZrNXIi0Zd6W3ieFWgv0+hF8QkIWGZQ82Pk9uceRYDnEGfbcL4mpAjmXq27ZO GbU12eScUMVENsgNdTxPp9PLT1j1s7mBTAc7k/CBlWBuM0X5BOM7NqO5wQu7iSKUGB8F RYUNJMS8HsIjOfRaAIiGvj38+mIx1JjEZWpHDcTb9rACcg5Hv/4gQ+ccYx3/sVwSHqTM GNk3KT9FcEwb8wINn5vJ+Lh1te3NmTJ5eTsfeMliyYnXRlI+IkE9khEh7ZWEr9mtrA0u gqzItFI2vYoUQocoRi/R3Es7Dxw2ENtyr5lx7bA6nPaUPXLsrtrtyP5DkoxHS5/0tTFf I60A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20230601; t=1701349922; x=1701954722; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=oSNDpcU55dh2tGtwPBNknCqbvnkho5WeNFrgIGdgoMQ=; b=X0O/j8WX6zW/Z0Kk+Etbg0UQ1o81XotRMu6+z2VmTyVfQMcQgzjsV9SyVr7itCwyo5 yRds7VcPcit8p9ubtwjYdhChl+bqXRiGVK7pXHTM2Htty6j+Hn+7dzjSP3yebJ298H4Y w/xQdDv9WuiYOvn9G2HtBBkxJmzcNxR36FIj8118sxyBpjxYpRRL72O0eihV6P/r+wCs gd7xHC3JXTZZzO13a1rW0C8kTEYJrmCuyIQ+4eNkgf4wfZUtZ1+SdwlPSWd0wgC2vX8Z Feavcmdv6aRTeeBhjWDUls2jtHB4kt7lUkSNjIayeMPlYoQ8CP8xU1vHSzURFitI4O8R uLhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YynGKdlJJWVGBZ5nFZqIgCdbDu63JCnksNf76coua6+LdQKcMsR XljhCVuAomio5XYfS5PDw98x+BIMv8ReCtsdKQi7sQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFW7uXjgGGCnbUph8JyPEghcuNu/aPx/FoUFfpZt4A2+J1m/i8C0CdUHUtqxQxcEEIaQJqWriBbGNTU0MEDrjA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:794:b0:4b2:a40b:87df with SMTP id k20-20020a056122079400b004b2a40b87dfmr1034227vkr.15.1701349922278; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:12:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Dhruv Dhody <>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:41:26 +0530
Message-ID: <>
To: Éric Vyncke <>
Cc: The IESG <>,,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c19d56060b5e65b1"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-pce-07-03: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:12:07 -0000

Hi Éric,

Thanks for your review.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:28 PM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <> wrote:

> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-pce-07-03: No Objection
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Like Martin, I suggest adding some text around collaboration with the
Dhruv: This is what I replied to Martin regarding any CATS work -

There is a possibility in future for it but as of now there is no work
> proposed nor it is listed in the CATS charter.

The WG also discussed this point at and
we concluded to leave that for a future recharter if/when the need arrives.

May I also suggest adding that all work items have an intended status of
> "standards track"
Dhruv: By default, all protocol extensions are meant to be "standards
track". However WG has produced informational documents when there is a
need for a separate applicability statement or a requirement document in
the past. I would like to leave the charter text as it is. Note that the
Milestones have the intended status.