IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC50A3A0F5B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WW9q2moU_laF for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8FB3A0F5A for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id y5so20072726iob.12 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aHCcO1RE6ehYCecyWgCbDcPf2tn6+OTWbd7H2i1afcA=; b=ruTLzVgeOUssQdFfBLCelYNUcovTZUafWyEZIcXmazFdYld+gbAyM4DeOiIveDUFH8 1s6v+bUCFO/jXPka1VbUOHZ5MlZ3MpjK9rfB9TFbP5JG8hO3uGRbSuWXiwZXlVSxxCFU KvkEQ+tHJ9y/+xRx17HWWApf1XO2GFBDN59SIgJXIhpBlqOZ7L9dARySYo+Bqu9CFA4t +1JUunkf0Lo9rqWZEZzCT++dSvh/bfDpQ102nc+Iw8DVy1fiDRcrhjO8ULEiPPKtpQp4 BmmFId06IgEi3p0o/DXo6XitlWVFyD58O04V5yNl39fA1FiOQ13tWRGX//IhaYupfLTI 0x9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aHCcO1RE6ehYCecyWgCbDcPf2tn6+OTWbd7H2i1afcA=; b=Tg0+UHDUhe0iIX6c7gfQOrjmcflNwOo5Zd9tlM+ik3NR3N2z2w9igsg5R1tTBs3dLs q3FwuWvRQBnw9B32o5+5K5TgQi9YgIL6R/6PykDbwAZ64i1O6aN1XbxUTkE3p2MI7WOO ao9eZq4krO4mU8scIwneIQ4IygV7Vn0fIloJkaDUl730PAImxgO0W9E1RhQDX5bTvHrn LsoMwH161zamGxI9+CJNmYjvFHWlMHpNTlDE4vKPy6R1/Pjv2+VvdUSVEi5iX5wpWR6w 4pZjPykpobV/dCdsbILftMGysyt9v+CqjYvjoWfiNgynQiJJMzaFLbID3YZTgmcpSv5A YQiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ULtHnuUGHb1tNni4TXcjN67dUwynOjc1x+4JK3or7nDAusf+d tpoQ5lSNTBmTzvJzTH23wdM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFyHy6F9ChmPJP9EdjZ2K1xdtIgkDHrZOJVGOQsCuj2D5hnNqr7AFcifCB5O/t3eJ6/tfqRg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1785:: with SMTP id y5mr2241047iox.62.1592842932526; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CH2PR19MB4024.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:304:2892::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm8564105ioq.9.2020.06.22.09.22.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
Thread-Index: AVFrc3ZqJsXVG+FDewvAIlXoH4MKjom6e6HW
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:22:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CH2PR19MB4024A0387E4FAC02CAC319C5FC970@CH2PR19MB4024.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/-obwQILnpXbfg5fmL7yWyXBlK6Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:22:16 -0000

I support adoption of the ID. The ability to initiate/report/delegate colored SR policies (and candidate paths) via PCEP is crucial, and this draft addresses this.

Regards,
Trek

On 6/7/20, 3:46 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi WG,

    This email begins the WG adoption poll for
    draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/

    Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
    - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
    you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
    the list.

    This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.

    Thanks!
    Dhruv & Julien

    _______________________________________________
    Pce mailing list
    Pce@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email