Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

<> Fri, 11 October 2019 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5557E120804 for <>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 01:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.29
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJZH3mlyTA2Y for <>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 01:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8B2120241 for <>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 01:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.7]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 46qLwv2Y0jz8t7w for <>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:39:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.73]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 46qLwv1mJqz2xC0 for <>; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:39:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [] ( by OPEXCAUBM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:39:42 +0200
To: "" <>
References: <>
From: <>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:39:42 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: []
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:39:50 -0000

Hi all,

It looks like there is support on this I-D and all authors have
responded to the IPR check. We can adopt it as a WG document.

Authors, please submit the I-D as "draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-00".


Dhruv & Julien

On 25/09/2019 18:20, wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
> In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
> for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
> like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
> the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?
> Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment
> you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt
> it. This poll will end on October 9.
> Thanks,
> Dhruv & Julien


Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.