IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Shepherd Review of draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 22 September 2019 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7840A12002E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbGSbgJLUnom for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498FC120024 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8MKGrLP005789; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:53 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B704B2203C; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A24E92203A; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.72.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8MKGobx031637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:51 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Hariharan Ananthakrishnan' <hari@netflix.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
References: <CAL70W4q1DJ3WsGyN+88sXkCU+VT0omn9u3vzQzB1_GmTc4AH3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL70W4q1DJ3WsGyN+88sXkCU+VT0omn9u3vzQzB1_GmTc4AH3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:16:50 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <037901d57182$abe9c890$03bd59b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQDVPz5ZV7qb86ImGNLuJLFaUtsACqk4g45g
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.72.158
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24928.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.272-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.272-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24928.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--8.271600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HXSqh3WYKfuWfDtBOz4q23FPUrVDm6jtBhfhOps3jahXPwnnY5XL5FEt MRGFGDWD2tmoqiGUvaKmQiqBg0hpSG8Nr8jnZavLH9HlIp7fUBGu+ACrt1e+WqMVwpOQMj2MSeQ h3pm1dj45Rg1eyvWfXTgOA5268BU3N2GXzj6bC8JcrmR4Jr5uaAvxMaV6x4s8RjNrjV0arFLoFU 9MRXQZvXFKqE7VNqHUCCCt1s6uEATsAGjS6lxxKsK1Ib9JAALxKNlHmNt0jkqbKItl61J/yY3BZ j4qY5QbDMq3z/Y/gtV5zdAzex5xZokQ9TKobLo+CTyeS37lsYVwuCW4yLXaAa53mhMMi7Tbx6os yv7X5oKUTGVAhB5EbQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/osqEawrdc0WHjjlugmYCiF1upb8>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Shepherd Review of draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 20:16:58 -0000

Hi,

I’m willing to be guided here.

I don’t think the new draft makes any changes to how a code point seen in in the wild should be interpreted.
And the “updates” relationship will be in place.

But if people think it is valuable we could have…

IANA maintains a registry called the “Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers” registry with a subregistry called " SRP Object Flag Field". IANA is requested to update the Reference in that subregistry to include a reference to this document in addition to [RFC8281].

Best,
Adrian

> This document is well written and clear. Thanks for the update. Please find below
> my comments on draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01.
>
> OLD:
> 8. IANA Considerations
> This document makes no requests for IANA action
>
> NEW:
> The current IANA for this object has reference to "RFC8281" (https://www.iana.org/
> assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#srp-object-flag-field) Dont we want that refer to this
> new draft since we have updated the text ?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email