[Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/SID to the BSID draft
Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 13:41 UTC
Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3050C3A1334 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:41:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2YLUkSMfOwY for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B673A1332 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id g15so15216427pgu.9 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:41:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJCwXmXvSRloaclf+VyP2AqO+CjaOUXuY/GPr24juCI=; b=ilC62Ncim+QA3jJxfH3bYKysdWUgMhpKX25a/CbzQA5dCgOTLkDsWhH/ADrX+aQ2y2 SQo7+bDbwhBPMmoPotN08bYZKBfNV/zNej+FuPstN4DMFryrsJxtircpUpAFNee36JTP Yg8xesI3ABPqEbtoUZ0LucACcvCp6xlcom5Sdhrzj/bVUObW1/jaG40wP7KLtSQWeZS6 H7X20zSdo6VQl+LvECYrysI/3ZY0Vapyb+IcuyqectfQcCtib8Q3l4hMuItUXrRxgs3d eEIfOxLPHaYDoiR4LUGKa/7IBpxabc90T8Z+jutYATS0JPXILZt5LHgMFlwWPxOUG4y2 Y5yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJCwXmXvSRloaclf+VyP2AqO+CjaOUXuY/GPr24juCI=; b=mDljwYaR0w1bnsoOg8sM4/trTS4nNjSdg/B2NOBXRP1fwLgIzcjL5D0ogBEeU879Ps LNTtmzJUxCj65n0IoXvSEu24dig6n6q5zpY0fXObO/JH+zjBtGmAZVkJUE8UgvbJiHfU v3Lai63LVEfCe1K9euFu6I3DeAv00iqdn7l5VEGld2LCPyHKcPYZJ/NfMJszeIPtnr4+ oEahuIrDlfhF9N9JIyNVildt0mbvE2TAC1KJdXmTFXHkCCzgW5wOJ89gCyPPPQ71u6OU sST94OmrYI17mLtfo5LruXjENX/33RspYj+AkllfWs4vgrO26C8T19CjbtPznD4fPB46 v11A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pbafHjYd2eKVflNcoEfCHIIcUOw/tMzBbv3fsBL2LHA0XqxHB Ex9DFM7HQayZyawhiwxnUEd/9OLEIgqh59zkOmKBZ13MXXr+jlW/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyB2nGQRjYNWssxgNQ2uZvJ1mdasRXnzoNmJ4fOmDOvzYLPha8mMV80Fe+mVi2twevbH15EyIS6VeVeBwO5eMU=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6542:: with SMTP id a2mr9422530pgw.148.1611150108331; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:41:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 19:11:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5a=yNCwwoi-MXVHJ_qnCH=cOtimDSfGPYGcSo5tbCrigA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/pDdXwBh3CcW8q4lhTL5rNcuuqx4>
Subject: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/SID to the BSID draft
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:41:50 -0000
Hi WG, Authors, As part of the handling of RTGDIR comments [1] for the PCECC I-D [2], it was discovered that it is a better idea to handle the Binding SID allocation by the PCE in the BSID I-D [3]. Julien and I agree. Also, it makes sense to move the new P-flag in the LSP object here (from path segment WG I-D [4]). Cheng and I have this proposed update - Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-05&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06.txt Please let us know if anyone has any concerns with this approach. This draft is in our WG LC Queue [5]. Thanks! Dhruv/Cheng [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/4n6FpBoDHjnGppKH4bcVotUu_hE/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment/ [5] https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/wiki/WikiStart#WGLastCallQueue
- [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/SID … Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Siva Sivabalan
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Siva Sivabalan
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Moving PCE Allocation of Binding Label/… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)