IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Mon, 12 October 2020 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22663A0983; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 20:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSEVdYMy_tPi; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 20:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72FFB3A0A0B; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 20:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D16D56C0D58119C6B75B; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:22:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:22:02 +0100
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:22:02 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.108]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:21:59 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir
Thread-Index: AQHWmzuIqJI12yU71E2JRtY+Uj4O96mTVokg
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 03:21:58 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02C32377@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Zfz4vmc2yn3ZQZPUej-LQUukUXP3jOYceY=RAUK8dvAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Zfz4vmc2yn3ZQZPUej-LQUukUXP3jOYceY=RAUK8dvAA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/pmJNpJ9VxHu00u_1nf0bkKyciwU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 03:22:35 -0000

Hi，

I support the document. This document is well written and the text is mature. Also, I think this is a good base work for associating bidir LSPs for MPLS, SR-MPLS and even SRv6.

Thanks,
Cheng




-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 1:17 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org; pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

Hi WG,

This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1].  Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the LC and adoption calls.

The WG LC will end on 20th October 2020.

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email