[Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection

Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hari@netflix.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71FA12051B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netflix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLvBugk3vdwz for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x933.google.com (mail-ua1-x933.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::933]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D925212009C for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x933.google.com with SMTP id d5so288385uan.6 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1wuxjymOrL+UXklXX0ny/Yk5Bbsh+GQBDtDXiBEQoYc=; b=mD6uUMpjaFXeNSY7SBjNRLCU349WEwGiSNgrWYiZ7JpGgxifq85d4dsfYzJBH78+L/ KIJ0ctSZLqKoj62lsa9lwJr/INEppiJV4HQdYwuaS/REeOOHh8MQ+lqzUTYjfGur21lC UAjp94/UjFMRmN+Hb3QBPmNMhTlVraa3shPCo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1wuxjymOrL+UXklXX0ny/Yk5Bbsh+GQBDtDXiBEQoYc=; b=IxmEYJ8ZUpnf6wf+wPnIxz6jpy5ZoczDHu3KGmgArE3Sv55gWkdn87anVg+b7AsFKJ pWXAdjdKnjLRdsnl0NmyoDwH+WOSjsQi92qH6TDeoMyCue4QvNWOvEJve+vimGEHDQsh k4zifvIJlABKICXBX7imcjv0blwgbzcvq2h6uKYupNHYsvguRYzjS9NRenOWYBq0zIyH lmViht2A0nW2fX/MnIJ9Nc3mnhJ7CJLL3YX9fBBngQvzZlFwRI399IGWMIszUA2PwukE oNWqQJq64iAr7CyFchDvcPRYm5DZBXsmxk9Y3cz7ULZN5Mc8N9Cp6BxbTKnRPq338lkq VZDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUYNZx99d0qAf1AxQEt9zbw6XDvlnna5clUFGjdObzXs4TLBbc6 GuvJgWKhnTD8kXxtNS023Ese3FpO59Xag8/jH5FQt96+HGk5Bg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyhC8N3WOdvVBbTEHj+6dpdEjSstKEBwMF9qrbYLk8WQDQzPJsiH5MnPI/sbROrmbXhxWjMN8+vr5HXc4nl6SM=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:73d3:: with SMTP id m19mr21523722uaq.46.1554865043830; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 19:57:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL70W4qf+Aw-CfQ7ga54aBHKyn+qcNCrue5Zy-sEacNf=8YmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cbcec0586243a6d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/qIMJlmba5sKn_zx2cTeFGKjtipw>
Subject: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 02:57:28 -0000

Hi authors,

In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
timely manner.

Thanks,
- Hari