[Pce] IETF 108 meeting survey

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Thu, 06 August 2020 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6193A0EB8 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5uc32XqHfb6 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E369A3A0EBA for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id f193so13906694pfa.12 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3tiGwgpRJ5ncdOznre5Ej7zz4zUjWG5lN8bJnzCMVLY=; b=z3idpP30RRjUVP+b2W30pxZ+sfpkDxi4OUWUasEe7JQDiYgbfeVOUuubNMjCcd7b13 tgiApot+VuYHaGolZ8HVsymHG1TW3fcI5UVIA44R1h5cNUsXn06gJQ0jJZL3YQ91zzKH O8ouKvjYIbBrZfvZk0MNfanlCJKKPG9GsYJXvvh1ddid98itk9JAV8gkHv9gBBXr6QuY au2MI9SYek2mrrN332jjRUKzDTj4sxOFdsawHmYZ91PCtJVfNDgtb68XMDvV3lAewOMB KjbF5s+ZGlBb4sRZY2MsFFRA174UTB5GzKfKQdWjV8PBCv+qAsT7izxOLibWr1+8k3R5 JXgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3tiGwgpRJ5ncdOznre5Ej7zz4zUjWG5lN8bJnzCMVLY=; b=MpffN60ywckWxYrG0gJgv3c/YDYALhg1G2iXOYg3VlCdlKMIHdYX48CktSqV+SvIZm rfmQ9BOWrWyBem3SGgL9gNphMBrQufWKL7zu0yebGidEnysBb3dapBPg+z3KGQ3q5X+/ nlJJhzxMPHQrHj3ktfs22T6IGK6HOLo74k0lnsUj3E+DmHDlgbHU2QJ7saGBGrjWdDO7 Xnc6doWd6fEWhoe6uGCHz/xMhWRGTkk5T2dvlPUMq5IQnOG/eJSxxVbkqD+euHDP817G Kk3k19zp4MZ+9Y3n/I4D9VwMCCVJ7JSYPOmyCfmaQT+LPyFwwFNM9I791UeZ0bOrF7vi 0R2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+4p/ZQgJ7PgrXAe+p7Ffw8JQ5whSlHnKKbIHDbAukmuLVEqJX nfqfvJ+iE7qzZmsTi4wbGyQsSJOfOiTo2mgEP4hfDTPRKo+vzA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVgR5sbC49g7/jlJ9rD8vynfovEW78RhgCPU1npIwOu5quKN7utx/DjisdVzLQSbk6C33b19FzIrcTP8It1M8=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:a20d:: with SMTP id m13mr6906850pff.201.1596692497910; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 11:11:26 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5YbFupDcHU5qt2Hvbb0AqXQQGKFn4GK_sfbkbxpLZyegg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/qzjbTTzm-8ywgkBC7z7KsGplFHg>
Subject: [Pce] IETF 108 meeting survey
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 05:41:40 -0000

Hi WG,

If you have already filled out the IETF 108 survey, feel free to skip
to the next email and apologies if you received multiple such requests
:)

Please participate in the IETF 108 survey at
-https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/T3SL7JF

This survey is critical to understand what worked during the past IETF
108 week, what didn't, what can be improved...

Your suggestions with the format, tools, timing, etc can be provided
in a systematic way to the IETF and can help in improving the next
iteration.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien