Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

julien.meuric@orange.com Thu, 18 February 2021 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEFC3A0FD2 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 02:35:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BagJId2tzZcC for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 02:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F9F3A0FCF for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 02:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) by opfedar25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4DhB173rntz8tY7; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:35:07 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1613644507; bh=HBOmpZtrEi0gffBE8fJqAkMzl8yQ7puvq9nBgWU7IBI=; h=From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eN55k/aeOxRqqhipUsZlOw7ysJYoinJiufJ8EGBnosOebU+NhnUvPWTow17exMvPK 1VnKGYKUdPNpLvRr9EkQ9tQR5UPUTXQqymXM1mFIEl8mr00PEZNpI3hANGgqF5nWVX ogTTVZxzYB2dWksEaCkL7oXVQYpcMky0sx47WXxzCIZlZIo/iZRIxMfjXpsdz//2cr rILe6dSiSHLasPvphymfKyf7c9My7etzvRLZbsMaFdaGj1St/WuLlIr4bm+H3kvn6D nL1Rt63efu+mbjsCuES7qqnud/jh1+ZQD/WY394crab51cpo3hCUV5PADVtkikJIn6 RAZLj69vhLvJQ==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.29]) by opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4DhB171JfWzCql7; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:35:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.192.150.121] (10.114.13.247) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:35:06 +0100
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
CC: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <557499ee-62df-102e-3da4-7fd386b7ff98@orange.com> <AM7PR07MB6248748F50E97F6EBBDC5623A0B19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAB75xn4-CVSiciw22MRMzW7QrBd2B-_w9q+NqROi=JXDCqHr2Q@mail.gmail.com> <AM7PR07MB62487FBAC51E63F4D6274B70A0869@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <14095_1613644507_602E42DB_14095_31_10_da0642af-1a00-9a5e-763b-f1edc6912fcb@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:35:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB62487FBAC51E63F4D6274B70A0869@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.247]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/rkqyOsEZIpnlfywnG0nJ9md-ODQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:35:10 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thank you for your valuable feedback.

Some of the issues you point out are easy to address and we've already
requested the authors to revise the I-D accordingly. To fully resolve
your concern, could you please point any other specific parts where you
feel you have to "interpret the words the way you think they should have
been"? If you even have some text to suggest, that could smoothly ease
the update.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


On 17/02/2021 12:46, tom petch wrote:
> <snip>
> <tp>
> I am sure that IANA will cope because they always do, but it will be by reading between the lines, applying intelligence to what the authors may have meant, and so on.  Editorially this is a poor I-D (as yet), and that quality verges on the technical aspects.
>
> Thus 7.3 says the I-D defines five new TLV and lists four; this also occurs in the body of the I-D.  A reader might also notice the absence of TBD2 and wonder.
>
> Or the new Association.  Thus needs an identifier.  Trouble is, the I-D uses (at least) three different ones; this looseness of terminology can lead to problems down the line.  (MPLS I see as a classic in how not to specify IANA registries and I see this heading the same way).
>
> Likewise the identifiers used in s.7 do not match those in current use, a good way of storing up future trouble.
>
> Is the specification adequate?  Only if you do not take it literally and interpret the words the way you think they should have been.
>
> Tom Petch
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.