Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

+1

Regards,
Jeff

> On Feb 22, 2021, at 14:13, Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <andrew.stone@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 thanks Julien, also support the document. 
> 
> Did not recognize that binding label and path segment we're requesting bits as well. Seems like this draft is pre-empting the inevitable exhaustion at a good time. 
> 
> Thanks
> Andrew
> 
> 
> On 2021-02-19, 11:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>    Ah, that's useful. Thanks Julien.
> 
>    Makes this work more pressing.
> 
>    Informative references to those two drafts would help focus the reviewer's mind and might be handy when this draft overtakes those other two documents and goes to the IESG.
> 
>    Cheers,
>    Adrian
> 
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: julien.meuric@orange.com <julien.meuric@orange.com> 
>    Sent: 19 February 2021 14:38
>    To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
>    Cc: pce@ietf.org
>    Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
> 
>    Hi Adrian,
> 
>    Thank you for your feedback.
> 
>    If evidence is needed, how about binding label?
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-06#section-11.2
>    Note it's also reused in
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-03#section-4.2
> 
>    Have a nice week-end,
> 
>    Julien
> 
> 
>>    On 18/02/2021 16:57, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Thanks to the authors for cleaning this up a lot since last time.
>> 
>> I don't object to adoption. Would be nice to have evidence of someone
>> needing a bit now, but by the time this becomes an RFC it is reasonably
>> possible.
>> 
>> Adrian
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
>> Sent: 01 February 2021 17:48
>> 
>> Hi WG,
>> 
>> This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03
>> 
>> This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by
>> defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing
>> sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned.
>> 
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field
>> 
>> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
>> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
>> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
>> the list.
>> 
>> Please respond by Monday 15th Feb.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv & Julien
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>> 
> 
> 
>    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
>    Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>    pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>    a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>    Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
>    This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>    they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>    If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>    As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>    Thank you.
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Pce mailing list
>    Pce@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce