IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341C51A024E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:58:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Og7eMdBMT2KM for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14CC1A702A for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CBQ49073; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:58:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML706-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:58:03 +0000
Received: from BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.45) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:58:03 +0000
Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.125]) by BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:28:02 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRN70WmgrEh4YL0kS866SV4ef+GJ7NCxJA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:58:01 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C496F93@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20151216044745.30653.89084.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151216044745.30653.89084.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.244.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5670EF5D.0098, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.125, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 28a683dde3ab13e4722b39c876902389
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vV0iUwVXmnU68UkBlTWGXlttuI0>
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:58:11 -0000

Hi WG, 

With this update - 

(1) Change in copyright notice, because of the text from RFC 5440 (pre-Nov2008 work disclaimer).
(2) Explicit section on what changes need to be made in RFC 5440, as suggested by our AD.  
 
Please let me know if you have any concerns. 

Regards,
Dhruv


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 16 December 2015 10:18
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of
> the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Update to Include Route Object (IRO) specification
> in Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP)
>         Author          : Dhruv Dhody
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 6
> 	Date            : 2015-12-15
> 
> Abstract:
>    During discussions of a document to provide a standard representation
>    and encoding of Domain-Sequence within the Path Computation Element
>    (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path
>    Computation Client (PCC) and a PCE, or between two PCEs, it was
>    determined that there was a need for clarification with respect to
>    the ordered nature of the Include Route Object (IRO).
> 
>    An informal survey was conducted to determine the state of current
>    and planned implementation with respect to IRO ordering and handling
>    of Loose bit (L bit).
> 
>    This document updates the IRO specification of RFC 5440 based on the
>    survey conclusion and recommendation.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-iro-update/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email