Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
Peng Liu <liupengyjy@outlook.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 09:36 UTC
Return-Path: <liupengyjy@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85C33A0BC9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_huL0YuGxyd for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255079.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2E63A0BCC for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 02:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZcYUVADpJiMfDHxVnu+Wcs1qo887VnIIE2MhqsGyTnszTW6hC4UNbA3nUa66TJXfMCaIaCfrJj7+kb5kCAXnksgGSGd121AaZ5s9UOkCJkmvLkZSBQ9wp17yRLoZ9m+KJo2xzlo4pqfTVKiNSscqa6Of3B9840l3nYxKAatvMQPPjRc9oMCG/bcf6GHC7CGmN0hf4PNObavjabutyEfG/ALEjM6kNkFG+C94Zub6q9seOYoSmd5VoF+BxBf8IPOfMru4uPXxhHuoNubXl5lj3xKcx0m0u6noZC5sCu864ZvUkn0Ds9uRZiH4mAvH/Rfx5KeQtmf76Hn52+UOtKkgww==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qfDKzpnf7ZwRfgY8USvhdjNiUnflWUf1y8io9gYDAu8=; b=VBCPS9mo/tBcFmDAGVOJNeOEX9PYGnthGx7IClHXrAbIbNfK8C4TybDUelF+dKZvbkSd12ygxwfBPwPfRLFP80HsgE+w6p6Wa56T1GGj+twMrieyFjzNE7SvdpsM15UFA5kiyXZX9kpYl4NqXfAVwA+Frc2YSJjFmCo8+CoSZecJzTTP1mvHqflphz46a6ARtl8HENO4H60AQhLuZsC6fcJTUM+J6+fHGGFD/zjTsnsYhPy8aViVMplqG9fzk1q0r2+AtsC86WOwsAkJGAMkL35VfX/uhguvQnwAWSs0KWnys3TtIkY/3Q+Vw/kTYVEl6nRyeTf7VfoTKpUqRzWRpg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qfDKzpnf7ZwRfgY8USvhdjNiUnflWUf1y8io9gYDAu8=; b=dBcJ7UEyHZhzBRsbqcpOKdPhhdhxpLsgNRYPO2Fa9bnJ1c/w1Vl5c+8h1RLdHRjfHXko+Peeai14frc8q4EUsRBmVPy+ZO9vHWDlzFm+VVHBMVVefhwWjXYpMFrZaE+kEKWllHOKczBkYV8XmAaHcTnTA12Fk0MyH4bH6at9AwD7W9lSQXriF6rGg3TvsJOcFfX8H8WbR+fQ2+rR1bGuVok/bWJyp8ttQzUVypoOtRpZ1aqY2yqe/zq+etIU2pA6F7FNJ/gsA+KH5FEt2vWz6i2aqcf52A8YEDq4TNyoYncnpl2nzl1ITpomIT03ELz74jN9iFgaQEhwACVIVJF6CQ==
Received: from HK2APC01FT061.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::48) by HK2APC01HT204.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::393) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:35 +0000
Received: from PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::44) by HK2APC01FT061.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::361) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:35 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:27CE0502E3991676437CC143FB3284EB523C1D854E844FBCDF4E28A6306BABEF; UpperCasedChecksum:1687B6E280436EB293D5472D243CF7C843C6252F1966C27864B427116C85BF19; SizeAsReceived:8758; Count:51
Received: from PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c6c:ac78:97be:c1a2]) by PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c6c:ac78:97be:c1a2%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:35 +0000
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:36:34 +0800
From: Peng Liu <liupengyjy@outlook.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-GUID: 837C0663-B5D9-40E0-A8A0-1FFEFF638745
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn]
Message-ID: <PU1PR06MB221551A6FBD16ABB67FAB250DA970@PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart624750072570_=----"
X-ClientProxiedBy: HK2PR02CA0133.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:202:16::17) To PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:38::11)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <202006221736319896661@outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from Peng (223.72.86.23) by HK2PR02CA0133.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:202:16::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.3109.22 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:34 +0000
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 837C0663-B5D9-40E0-A8A0-1FFEFF638745
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn]
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <202006221736319896661@outlook.com>
X-TMN: [8nyi5PdBTPJjsUQYRkXk+65osKk56LUp]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 51
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 81a78c73-af46-4171-b9a2-08d8168fc165
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK2APC01HT204:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: syVzI6TDUfPAsJIIixFBZWiWwiq/CAmmg+aunkBcO+LBTy4XvL67QmtiPSTgKj0/KwHL3lwTrIwYRIgmuDGfaPpUTuFa1KTZckaDy+q4p+3kW8q18aosDJSpz67HtC8cDuNOeBdJA2PxuwDrdxqzGSnH9b/6XaAQMMddd8Xk9PkQ4GgTiLJaM7XrhnlCEpSNDvFHKy6CFmgcCEelfDZn3GFIkuuf9X8dV2ypNQinx1Bw2zKqnCxpvxVyKKxvcRWy
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:0; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PU1PR06MB2215.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:1901;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: G91sr1z46R4ykfEpCdUwEZ3qCNninGvcg1/s+Id5LGlOoeIF96DQt2Nh3XQKA6i4WzqgjntprxNU2tvLwPF0NGJkIt3rd7F+iwCJi6XwgA43IdZh2LzQBt4tOBm+skrWSmtv1jfbtVqmcShIzYgLHQ==
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 81a78c73-af46-4171-b9a2-08d8168fc165
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2020 09:36:35.6946 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT204
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/0bWq9DwU7WgPqnQrRQGgcyMbJvA>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:40 -0000
Yes, Support. Regards, Peng Liu liupengyjy@outlook.com From: Dhruv Dhody Date: 2020-06-07 15:45 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
- [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segmen… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… huruizhao
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
- [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… qinfengwei
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Peng Liu
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Colby Barth
- [Pce] Fwd: FW: WG adoption poll for draft-barth-p… Siva Sivabalan
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… stefano previdi
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-se… Dhruv Dhody