Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

<julien.meuric@orange.com> Fri, 07 February 2020 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4379120143; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:58:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nweuCa43Yx94; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:58:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D521200DE; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 00:58:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48DTjz24bSz10Fd; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:58:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1581065927; bh=8Vdm5CyxKxxaHY7bqXayFvHkjvpKwfLebTkgcME2fgE=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f+/s8+E+x+XRP40J+1OsC9c+9CTtiwDFiHqxbJPNjJg21QaEYrcq7TyK2ZM11kiNw lWANG6al1BzLk1xwE+E4FLZko7/8z0nlUHrLxghooSE8IaAtX8kBiLVv945zBN4UV6 Hmw3NhRgfCzxYHiRmPOMM5FHTSIHVYJI2L2GcyF8Mwha0SjE9VXS+QJB1zUFHJhmWq 3sTqBo8FjnptGyRB2bZYW011wQrlZjc5wmJc9bOhH9qR2o1v3jFGG3R2eRb9GaXpVP ZM8bn2EoGdzIg3Km6qf4SKf/E+GJ2z8V+1gFbP8jMkUmASyoIHQ00dJwug2vwKuWHl l76142mWhJ/5A==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.104]) by opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48DTjz1M81zDq9G; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:58:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.21] (10.114.13.247) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 09:58:46 +0100
To: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: pce@ietf.org, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path@ietf.org
References: <e69cdba1-69c2-583c-3eaf-f14265a45d74@orange.com> <819569dd-0dd9-8980-2235-a2a8e6b70e83@orange.com> <CAMZsk6f3gGf-+n6po_xtR+sXom+njhPMxf8sJYNsB1Wws8aiMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <20962_1581065927_5E3D26C7_20962_123_20_0fc2168b-e272-c28b-2b13-f577a63c6248@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:58:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMZsk6f3gGf-+n6po_xtR+sXom+njhPMxf8sJYNsB1Wws8aiMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.247]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vjMO5SzeTvjTJk2DmGC4UGaWrRQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:58:51 -0000

Hi Rakesh,

Thanks for the quick update. We're ready to adopt this version. You may
now submit it as draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-00.

Cheers,

Dhruv & Julien


On 06/02/2020 18:40, Rakesh Gandhi wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> We have posted a revised draft 07 to address the comment on the author
> list.
> We plan to address the remained comments in the adopted revision.
> Please let us know if ok to post draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-00.
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07
>
> Thanks,
> Rakesh (behalf of authors)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM <julien.meuric@orange.com
> <mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     This I-D has enough support to be adopted.
>
>     Before we proceed, we'd like to see an update addressing at least the
>     issue about the number of names on the front page. Authors, please
>     submit a -07 version accordingly, so that we can move the draft
>     forward.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Dhruv & Julien
>
>
>     On 17/01/2020 11:12, julien.meuric@orange.com
>     <mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > It is time to share your thoughts about
>     draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
>     > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item?
>     Please
>     > use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
>     > disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the
>     latter.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     > Dhruv & Julien
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Pce mailing list
>     > Pce@ietf.org <mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pce mailing list
>     Pce@ietf.org <mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.