[Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Mon, 14 March 2016 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D203E12D55B; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3J1VTD9dJhe6; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDCF12D6BC; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049458.ppops.net []) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. ( with SMTP id u2EM9JQj043824; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:13:54 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com []) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 21mfewgann-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:13:54 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost []) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2EMDsj1018200; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:13:54 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com []) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2EMDkxm017945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:13:48 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com []) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:13:41 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:13:41 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update
Thread-Index: AdF+PUH1DkpEy/ucScaC/upRYq7hUQ==
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:13:41 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C852847AAE@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C852847AAEMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-14_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1603140308
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vnMHBSMIQWNX7zAPnv14Ut-u67M>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pce-iro-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-iro-update@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:14:03 -0000


I've done my AD review of this document and only had a few comments:

-       I've provided the author with some editorial suggestions to improve the abstract and introduction.
-       As the survey document will not be progressed to RFC, it will be best to remove the reference to it from this document, and reword a bit these sentences on it.

Dhruv is updating the document for these edits and I'll then start the IETF Last Call.