Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Zhenghaomian <> Sun, 15 September 2019 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C17E1200EC; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.631
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWTW_Tp0o_Xx; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B03120048; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 22:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DB0F0FE7A71DC139D287; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:21:42 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:21:41 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:21:34 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <>
To: Dhruv Dhody <>, pce <>
CC: pce-chairs <>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
Thread-Index: AQHVX17ThzZBq3yDakOMnM/OoYvsyKcsTCPk
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:21:34 +0000
Message-ID: 5171A061-D94D-41DB-AA94-D6D5AE4809C2
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5171A061D94D41DBAA94D6D5AE4809C2_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 05:21:48 -0000

Dear WG,

I have read this document and believe it is helpful to have a quick publication.

This is a small draft with very focused problem statement on PCEP flag processing and also clear target documents to be updated. With the growing number of flags in PCEP it would be helpful to guide the implementation on a standard way to process unknown flags.

My 2 cents,

郑好棉 Zheng Haomian
Mobile: +86-13066975206<tel:+86-13066975206>
发件人:Dhruv Dhody <>
收件人:pce <>
抄 送:pce-chairs <>
时 间:2019-08-31 02:14:56
主题[Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Hi WG,

This email starts a 'working group last call' for
draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an
uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. See [2]
for context.

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft.

If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your

If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and
it is ready for publication.

As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019.

PCE Chairs


Pce mailing list