Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 16 August 2017 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3A0132626; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6ORbgF922GB; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACE2132622; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26301C0496; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1502898480; bh=DQONiAweeOy21p7SDspn4wyqS0pI8nxPX6Yhns/Px6g=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=rPg411NGlCGLA5tRJasHr9GBkAUPlgyUJTj7poK0TkbDXwgnRR/b4y2ZXNxOypS// N2XgpXwDbXjI2dDwHBIUy5lKHSPkkc8PuX38HM5qCNNk+88/NK7OSt5ZYNzFQX7iWC 5o5iGFsiBxYRe9pVPUENNVFYKc65D0ub0wgF8f6s=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.225.209.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17C85403133; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <150240703036.8476.2109418125181500710@ietfa.amsl.com> <25b0a2c3-0d8b-0e65-15f7-7e4c360032a9@orange.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <d1e134b2-a440-a8b2-b15f-8686906c3e38@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:47:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <25b0a2c3-0d8b-0e65-15f7-7e4c360032a9@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xOtXV5XcRDY7dvyThUSH8T_HCsw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:48:02 -0000

That would work for me.  I did conclude that the WG was happy with the 
term, which is why I considered it a nit.

Yours,
Joel

On 8/16/17 11:20 AM, Julien Meuric wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> Any issue with a request to initiate an LSP setup/teardown to a device? ;-)
> 
> I agree the name reads odd, but it has been there for some time now and
> the WG seems to be fine with it. Besides, it does not prevent anyone to
> add better wording in a patch to their favorite decoding software...
> 
> Thanks a lot for your review,
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
> Aug. 11, 2017 - jmh@joelhalpern.com:
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>      It seems odd to have a message for the creation or deletion of an LSP
>>      called an LSP Initiate Request.