[Pce] Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

julien.meuric@orange.com Tue, 30 July 2024 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426FEC14F6AB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 01:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6VEE-2XBOkI for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 01:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.orange.com (smtp-out.orange.com [80.12.126.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D9FC14F689 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 01:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; i=@orange.com; q=dns/txt; s=orange002; t=1722328619; x=1753864619; h=message-id:date:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=54CeincUZD0VFjkMwnxFywjCqEu+kPnqD0ziqsCZxig=; b=fgcenRARN+u3ocujZBXavLjOEtDUJ588FQAiU3xFmpqkQIIvDvBHznu/ DhpRdkEOcNg0xkw/jDS/KPSoCGtj6/GzAZ05zZlsUwxbXoQU/1DHFvEio KLojEe9pcdbyX6ZesXLOfCmMkRrjNGrjF18RoFgeN/wwSqmnqJLz33FSi FjWaLmFlYzmcklKGoBjxeai9JF/lpyzptOLuXr2vfvoJ2J1QyZtFJ8OLe ShxhkhMUbWhiMiVr5pVNB1ickuIR0CNxmZjDy76tuVPOrWgJD5w3tsjtm EXXD99Sz/O6G6g66FjUqiYliA9oCQFLjS6RpqXcaohNkYR+Pd3VE0raQx g==;
Received: from unknown (HELO opfedv1rlp0f.nor.fr.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by smtp-out.orange.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jul 2024 10:36:57 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by opfedv1rlp0f.nor.fr.ftgroup with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 30 Jul 2024 10:36:57 +0200
Received: from [x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x] by OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup [x.x.x.x] with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:36:57 +0200
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,248,1716242400"; d="scan'208";a="173759664"
Message-ID: <cf19c561-2070-4f5d-a759-d1dc6faaf65f@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:36:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US, fr
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Organization: Orange
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.26.53]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX402.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.26.15) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-ID-Hash: FCPYDMB32ABEVLOVC5ECGCAWZBNWMV2Y
X-Message-ID-Hash: FCPYDMB32ABEVLOVC5ECGCAWZBNWMV2Y
X-MailFrom: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xph9c2NBK4-7eydZ9eziiw8lIC8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider 
adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP 
registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted 
draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring 
higher consistency among PCEP registries.

As a result, does the WG support the adoption of 
draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your 
feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case 
you're opposed.

Thanks,

Julien


[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.