IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-05

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Fri, 18 February 2022 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75433A0C1C; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:50:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T11QnO0ENHuA; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4469C3A0C21; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:50:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4K0Ml01NlGzBCBh4; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:50:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4K0MkP24xbz501bc; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:49:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 21I6nIeI034036; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:49:18 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:49:18 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:49:18 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb620f416e926dccfa
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202202181449185134120@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5a0Az+beMPxKwqgct3TJ15wQgA52jXt-D4h1d6b4D_eQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAP7zK5Z4-B9j+cbcu_hvbNSzpQCWUKdAFLR=09bMLBROsARgVQ@mail.gmail.com, CAP7zK5a0Az+beMPxKwqgct3TJ15wQgA52jXt-D4h1d6b4D_eQQ@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
To: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: <pce@ietf.org>, <draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo@ietf.org>, <mahendra@rtbrick.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 21I6nIeI034036
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 620F419C.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1645167004/4K0Ml01NlGzBCBh4/620F419C.000/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 620F419C.000/4K0Ml01NlGzBCBh4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/y-omuTQBbVM4eNTRQisjYcEfT7o>
Subject: Re: [Pce] =?utf-8?q?WG_Adoption_of_draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-05?=
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 06:50:15 -0000

Hi Chairs, WG,

Support as a co-author.
After enabling flexible algorithm in IGP domain, the SID stack depth  can be significantly reduced, which makes SR-TE path across multiple domains benefit by including algorithm related SIDs, with shorter SID list and higher packet encapsulation efficiency. The mechanism proposed in this document enables the controller to install the SR-TE path related to the algorithm to the network node.

Regards,
PSF


------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人：DhruvDhody
收件人：pce@ietf.org;
抄送人：draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo@ietf.org;Mahendra Negi;
日 期 ：2022年02月18日 12:08
主 题 ：Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-05
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Hi WG,

A reminder to please respond to the WG adoption poll by Monday!

Please be more vocal. The silence makes it difficult to judge consensus.

Also, the IPR responses from Alex, Shuping, and Mahendra are missing still.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:44 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo-05.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tokar-pce-sid-algo/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 21st Feb 2022.

Have a great weekend.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email