[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec
Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> Mon, 14 October 2019 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <hari@netflix.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CAF1208E2 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netflix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WYokiemnqOik for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B011208D1 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id s7so11271570vsl.2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tx2d7eocAawSTpy1D78djKbJzyZ71ay3VxMTcrlRqjk=; b=hX+tNRVtK3+HAcjIMSse8L1QkiGwFQaGgeZfyFGoQSvLUpO9JHDZ16rbAKo8YhSQ3m kpX90ZUoS45kfjj1gc3HLMl+v/8h8ZQiEqohUvAKZWny2VDfWyyAY2BpoDxum048du2M QBUK5zqEK7HWgxiVp9AFlFvzMp7yertGyHemM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tx2d7eocAawSTpy1D78djKbJzyZ71ay3VxMTcrlRqjk=; b=nSeyclM7aQhj5wkaLr0P5Rd0OXhcEN/bpLgKuC+Cf8G1Dnpu7+AkGa4NVPpAInaSAm 11+y2KpJ4aP8d7mcd5lfo2LBO1NOtCtfGDyZoRg746h4E4zDncg7EalAYBOayLmNICQq oS9AHcQuivhrGxQt41pS7v8NqL9OFljwBz1ZZklRr5uY+UpRCCbgXq+M/dTpZ1oALP5V VgCdqOncfCljEbolCuPOnTiHX5yIPX95TlLxV7nDEKGcdgyMn4ZAcWh4ua88G5d4Q07s Ng6YMjsyKi/MAinSGYD0Ck71MVIamsYAEkZIPXVVTmQsqX2xd09dJ1V9KwAP8hNX7ALx NirQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAD5Lo+nYKXOIXKExP9T+xch2r5146lT5DhuXpsOw2coQ94WAL Fd6nqRfxPJ0HL2isCVJteDnK4jbJbGtWoowabwJUFw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzY0uUWXyVjGdFyKZ7D4yFjvtZX0xrLQgz6epK+0UDvoHXBIItIPX/ZscBH36RI1PSrKu1Qec1nbw7F23EQTQI=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f4cf:: with SMTP id s15mr11074055vsn.58.1571072427180; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:00:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL70W4q9kFPa+_8+ynwc3y0fkD6hLACkRCynW8tJQ2ZauE0Psw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, lizhenbin@huawei.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f091670594e1cd94"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ya0xd9MFjUERkAriiL7EPow9Dd0>
Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:00:30 -0000
Hi Authors, In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, - Hari
- [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec Lizhenbin
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec Zhuangshunwan