Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: (with COMMENT)

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja,

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:18 PM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: No Objection
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for quickly addressing the TSV-ART review (and thanks to David for this
> very clear and well explained review)! I would have preferred to actually see a
> normative requirement as original proposed by David ("sample interval SHOULD
> NOT be less than 1 minute") in section 5.2.1. Also I would have expected the
> proposed new text to show up somewhere in section 4 (maybe even as a new
> subsection).
>
>

Thanks for your review, as well as to David for TSV-ART review.

Regarding normative - as there could be different transport protocol
(with different congestion techniques), I feel providing a clear
warning to the reader about changing the default is better than using
1 min. I thought in some scenario the issue could be seen even if set
to 2 mins! And with the help of David we have consensuses on the
current text.

I have added text in section 4 and 5.2.1, with reference to section
6.6 in the working copy.

Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-12.txt

Thanks!
Dhruv