IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [PCN] Architecture draft - probing section & general updates.

"Geib, Ruediger" <Ruediger.Geib@t-systems.com> Tue, 23 October 2007 08:26 UTC

Return-path: <pcn-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkF5d-00016R-9M; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:26:17 -0400
Received: from pcn by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IkF5b-00016H-PN for pcn-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:26:15 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkF5a-00015u-TC for pcn@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:26:14 -0400
Received: from tcmail31.telekom.de ([217.6.95.238]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkF5V-0003TE-Vg for pcn@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:26:14 -0400
Received: from s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:26:08 +0200
Received: from S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de ([10.151.229.10]) by s4de8psaans.mitte.t-com.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:26:08 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [PCN] Architecture draft - probing section & general updates.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:26:08 +0200
Message-Id: <1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C0DE8FE@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de>
In-Reply-To: <BABC859E6D0B9A4D8448CC7F41CD2B070551D542@xmb-rtp-203.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PCN] Architecture draft - probing section & general updates.
thread-index: AcgSW1AlagmbQOCGTY+NFlaP1Yyp9wAANMQgALxKnwA=
From: "Geib, Ruediger" <Ruediger.Geib@t-systems.com>
To: acharny@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2007 08:26:08.0567 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C9FD470:01C8154E]
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: pcn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pcn-bounces@ietf.org

Anna,

could you re-write your point? I don't get the sense completely.

Thanks,

Rudiger


|   - should the WG consider the case when expected number of flows on
|very large number of ingress-egress aggregates sharing a bottleneck has
|on the order of *one* flow.  Note that this is the case when probing
|might be needed.


_______________________________________________
PCN mailing list
PCN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status